Thread regarding Bank of America layoffs

There are no upsides to RTO

They want employees to be just as productive as they were working from home but also want them to be in an open space office where the distractions are endless.

RTO would make more sense if it was truly beneficial but I've yet to see it and noticed the decline across the board since everyone was forced back. People are not happy with the lost time, commutes, and additional costs associated with RTO.

Pick one, clearly you can't have both.

Well said, @2ohh+1lDiRXyJ.

by
| 1583 views | | 4 replies (last April 2, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lQNMOpv

4 replies (most recent on top)

We are a large lender to real estate companies who rely on income from commercial real estate leases to make the payments to us on those loans. If those clients cannot pay these loans, it will cost the bank a sh!t ton in lost revenue.

Similarly, many Private Equity firms have become heavy players in commercial real estate and we have tons of loans out to them as well.

Note: BofA owns little, if any, of its own properties anymore. Am guessing BofA leadership believes they (along with JPM, GS, etc.) need to set an example and support the Work From Office model, so the entire portfolio does not collapse. Others may be able to shed more light.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6fbq+1lQNMOpv

Can someone explain how having people in office helps the banks real estate business? Sorry I’m uninformed regarding this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3skl+1lQNMOpv

they are more worried about real estate portfolio than people (or our productivity).

Let's not kid ourselves, none of this is about us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ekl+1lQNMOpv

For a bank that is highly invested in commercial real estate, there is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2oiu+1lQNMOpv

Post a reply

: