Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

On a scale of 1 to 10

how ethical is BNY Mellon?
I was asked a similar question by some person recently and I would've preferred to say that I no longer work here.

by
| 55618 views | | 15 replies (last April 9, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1g5YQE1E

15 replies (most recent on top)

Sounds like @2gsq is a supporter of black looters matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5mst+1g5YQE1E

OP, you need to widen your range into what I’ve numbers to get a precise measurement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4thm+1g5YQE1E

@4bbi+1g5YQE1E

Of course Todd is simply a continuation of Charlie. They’re all made in the CEO clone factory and literally stamped out by little elves in a hollow tree. The process was developed in the 1970’s when they began to stamp out monoclonal TV daytime game show hosts. Since then they’ve scaled it up to customize personalities but this was pre-Charlie, and the older Todd model could not be upgraded further due to hardware limitations.

Although he brought in a board member to lecture us about diversity. Either way, it's unethical, disrespectful and not very diverse to force employees to listen to this stuff when it has nothing to do with running a financial company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4dgx+1g5YQE1E

@3srf, Todd is just a continuation of Charlie. Although he brought in a board member to lecture us about diversity. Either way, it's unethical, disrespectful and not very diverse to force employees to listen to this stuff when it has nothing to do with running a financial company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4bbi+1g5YQE1E

@2hyq+1g5YQE1E.

Not sure if you’ve heard, but Charlie hasn’t worked here for almost 3 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3srf+1g5YQE1E

If we value, hire and reward diversity of thought, ideas, talents and abilities rather than superficial Woke goals we will have a talented workforce. Or we can simply continue to disintegrate as our best and brightest continue to leave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qzg+1g5YQE1E

@2sqv+1g5YQE1E is correct, if facts still matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gsq+1g5YQE1E

Sorry, @2zcv, but I'm not the one spouting misinformation and supporting egotistical dictators from spreading their lies to a captive audience when it has nothing to do with our business.
YOU are the one who needs help. Perhaps from a team of PHD's working 24x7.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2sid+1g5YQE1E

@2hyq+1g5YQE1E

Seek professional help.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zcv+1g5YQE1E

@2sqv, nasty and narrow minded are people like you and Charlie who spout your racist opinions that cops are gunning down black men when statistics show that white men are more likely to be ki---d by cops. Either way, it doesn't belong in a town hall meeting where he alienated half his employees who disagree with him.

And for him to use that stupid analogy that claiming all lives matters is akin to attacking br---t cancer advocates is especially narrow minded. Nobody denies that br---t cancer is an issue, but the facts show that the BLM claims that police target black men are flat out wrong. So people like you and Charlie are just smart enough to buy into that analogy but aren't smart enough to analyze the next step to see it's wrong. Not to mention that br---t cancer advocates don't burn down cities.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hyq+1g5YQE1E

1dme …. What a nasty and narrow minded comment. I’m no fan of Charlie but those ‘woke’ things are legitimate problems in society You just be one of those narrow minded trumpster types

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2sqv+1g5YQE1E

I'd give my co-workers and immediate supervisors a 10.
Upper management I give about a 3 with the biggest issues being:

  1. Stalking people to do your downsizing/offshoring instead of doing it openly and humanely.
  2. Pushing woke views which have no place at work. From Charlie giving us the s-b story about his black neighbors who felt they had to introduce the local police to their kids, to Charlie spewing BLM rhetoric and discounting half his employees opinion, to supporting the southern poverty law center and their communist views.
  3. Founding a company then using them to offshore IT like Suresh did.
  4. Forcing us to go from 35 hours to 40 hours with no increase in pay.
  5. Not delegating decisions yet claiming we should all act like owners.
  6. Forcing managers to give out BE ratings
  7. Choosing not to lend to oil companies.
  8. Hiring people based on their color and s-x instead of their competency.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dme+1g5YQE1E

Is forcing someone into the partially meets to meet the bell curve unethical if they do not deserve that kind of rating?

Otherwise I could say things are ethical. I am never punished for telling the truth and feel comfortable escalating everything to my management.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jfn+1g5YQE1E

Overal lower third ethically.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1czm+1g5YQE1E

Either someone is ethical or they are not. Managers at every level behave unethically. They lie. Verbally abusive. Threaten people. Intentionally hold people back. They get rewarded with bonuses and promotions.
There are a minority of managers with a high moral standard.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nzj+1g5YQE1E

Post a reply

: