Lots of discussion on here about the EVP of
HR. Perhaps Mark made another bad hire?! Talk about a poor selector of talent.
3 replies (most recent on top)
He may be more “down to earth” and “approachable”, but is anyone really approaching him for a chat? I doubt it. What matters more are actions, and how those actions affect employees and the work environment.
He used to drive tractors and was involved in hollowing out a foundational American company. What do you think his objective is here? Actions, not vibes.
Added transparency to roles? Have you looked at the ridiculous AI generated description of the responsibilities for your role?
And I assume he's behind the new effective SGL locks.
I agree with some of the takes on here but this is not one of them. He is down to earth, approachable, and has made a lot of good changes and added transparency to roles. Much better than the previous VP.