Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

BNYM is too top heavy

BNYM is a low cost provider so their best chance is to win as much business as they can and build scale that way. The problem is that they’ve gotten too top heavy and are now in a situation in which they have to increase fees a lot and possibly terminate unprofitable clients which end up subsidizing others’ fixed expenses. Management has been very inconsistent on this message, but if they keep going down this path, most businesses will be way underwater.

True words by Steven Seagull, a.k.a. @1pni+1ltTmCMu.

by
| 38526 views | | 12 replies (last March 11, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lvDjc7O

12 replies (most recent on top)

@1vwn

Please let it go until you understand pricing, revenue, costs and expenses.

Until then it’s all gibberish.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5kqg+1lvDjc7O

@2zad, BNYM is know for charging a premium for our services. We are NOT a low cost provider.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5hts+1lvDjc7O

@1vwn

Two year University of Phoenix Associates degree . That’s where they learn to mix up costs with revenues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zad+1lvDjc7O

BNYM is indeed a low cost provider (in terms of fees we charge). Maybe they aren't the lowest, but the reputation on both the street and people who know our financials would attest they are quite low. The company is CHEAP, pay is very low compared to other firms, and any profit is squandered on failed technology initiatives. Most clients are underwater.

Sec Lending = almost zero margin because of all the fixed costs
FX = better margins, but not enough.

State Street's markets group has a much better model. Citi has lower costs because of their wide custodian network. JPM charges a quite a lot, but they have both scale and the ability to have white glove service models. BBH is also white glove, but they are a joke firm these days. Why would any client go to BNYM?
BNYM has more bureaucrats that create obstacles and red tape while people doing the actual work are either underpaid or let go.

If you seriously dispute BNYM being a low cost provider, you're either a shill for this sinking ship's senior leadership or you actually take the short bus to work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vwn+1lvDjc7O

Sound like a broken record. Losing business to competitors so squeezing margins to get new clients, find out within a couple of years that business model isn't viable. Increase automation , still not profitable, outsource 15 % of staff to offshore location and lay off onshore people. Clients questioning decision. Still not profitable so offshoring 30 % of staff. Client very unhappy. Still not profitable. Last round of layoff/ offshoring. Clients leaving to competitors with local staff....and ...start again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fsy+1lvDjc7O

@kog

Reduction of Spans and Layers was the right approach, but Charlie left after two massive layoffs and now we have 4 3/4 years and counting without a badly needed layoff. And no, the 1% layoff in January wasn't even a drop in the bucket.

If we don’t learn how to cut at the top we’re through.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pmy+1lvDjc7O

@1vui

Yes, that’s the Operations problem. Can’t afford to hire onshore Operations so we hire offshore Operations and try to script jobs for them.

On the bright side the H-1B Offshore Technology teams are really good and many out do their U.S. based coworkers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bpw+1lvDjc7O

@OP

No, BNYM is NOT a “low cost provider”. BNYM is a Low PRICED provider with high costs.

That in a nutshell is our business problem and that’s why we need to lay off.

State Street and Northern Trust solved the cost issue it with technology. BNYM tried to solve it by deploying Roman Regelman to some LinkedIn communications project.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yiu+1lvDjc7O

Bigger problem is that there are tons of rank and file staff in “low cost locations” that aren’t pulling their weight. They cost less in the surface but pound for pound they are not worth the lesser cost. The real cost involves lots of hand holding, lower productivity, no business understanding, and work not getting done when “top heavy” employees are off hours and offshore staff are supposed to be working but nothing gets done. How many holidays does India have for example? Seems like 30. Plus every US holiday is basically a holiday for workers in every other location.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vui+1lvDjc7O

Low cost provider??? What planet are you from?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mvg+1lvDjc7O

Wasn’t Spans and Layers the magic cure for this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kog+1lvDjc7O

Most if not all corporations with long histories are too top heavy and too slow to change with the times. Some figure out how to survive while others cease to exist. BNYM will survive. Who knows in what form. Too many vested interests to let the ship sink.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hfo+1lvDjc7O

Post a reply

: