Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

Scare Tactics

Not buying this 3 days a week nonsense. If you have a high rating and are clearly valued you're fine. They're just trying to weed out the garbage.

by
| 48101 views | | 24 replies (last July 8, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1n5GwWgP

24 replies (most recent on top)

@qyhb

No, btt it may very well affect your performance review.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qtrd+1n5GwWgP

It'd really be helpful if HR would actually come out and state something like "when you have a company holiday during the week, you need to work x amount of days" instead of this guessing game with that and time off. There's two of us in my location and I'm being more cautious about it while my co-worker could care less. I doubt it will effect our performance reviews but some actual transparency and forewarning would be great.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qyhb+1n5GwWgP

3 days a week is part of your review now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @plvt+1n5GwWgP

@3ooc

Only some of us were more productive when working remotely. We measured productivity and it was steadily sliding during the two year COVID “NetFlix era”.

Bny made a big mistake… they trusted us. High Ho high ho, so it’s back to work we go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7mmg+1n5GwWgP

@2xjq

I for one don’t see how we save this Bank without attendance compliance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7cfe+1n5GwWgP

False.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4pib+1n5GwWgP

Yep. I now decline anything outside of my work hours.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3wdr+1n5GwWgP

Bny is making big mistake.
We are far more productive remotely. Now come in 3days week work less hours but do enjoy the easier schedule and no work/meeting before 9am

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ooc+1n5GwWgP

@2xjq

Yes, BNYM is prioritizing compliance above all else. The reason is our two year COVID WFH experience. We WERE monitored and we DID HAVE LESS productivity.

No, not all of us… but easily the majority.

In the face of these two years of experience and the results, I for one don’t see how BNYM has any alternative to requiring workers in the office.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3pky+1n5GwWgP

Todd’s nephew. Get back to work & quit wasting time posting on here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yfv+1n5GwWgP

@1inl+1n5GwWgP - I call your bluff. They don’t let “high performers “ go for speaking up. You either didn’t perform well like you claim , which they all claim this on here, or you did or said something that violated policy which is why you were let go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jki+1n5GwWgP

Speaking of psychologists, I saw a relevant quote this morning from the highly respected organizational psychologist, Adam Grant, about companies calling people back to the office: "Don't mistake presence for performance. Showing up is not a sign of commitment or contribution. It's an act of compliance. What matters is the value people create, not the place they inhabit."

Clearly, BNYM is prioritizing compliance above all else. Understand that this mandate has nothing whatsoever to do with your performance or commitment.

Answer this simple question for yourself: "Do I choose to comply - or not?" BNYM is concerned with only two responses: yes or no. If your gut response is "no," immediately make a plan to leave and seek employment somewhere that values performance and commitment over where you work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xjq+1n5GwWgP

BONY psychology:

The rarer the layoffs, the greater the layoff paranoia. I sure don’t understand it.

It’s a mass psychosis and we should have psychologists come in to study it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bid+1n5GwWgP

If they are going to let me go for not sitting in their building 3x a week I hope they do it soon so I can enjoy the summer off while doing some job hunting in the background.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oyq+1n5GwWgP

I’ve been telling folks with lenient managers fine with them not coming in that it won’t matter if a higher up intervenes and decides to make an example of them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qjy+1n5GwWgP

You are 💯 wrong.
They need names and there are plenty of high performers that will come in.
By not being a team player you will no longer be viewed as a high performer.
Not saying it makes sense but there a lots of eyes on this. Take it seriously or you are at risk.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rhy+1n5GwWgP

No you’re “not fine”. It’s not based on performance . Everyone is hitting the report that is now rolling out to management. And you’re color coded for upper management so they new who is on track, just below, and not in office at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mgv+1n5GwWgP

I was consistently ranked as a high performer. They let me go because I spoke up about the BS. They don't care about people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1inl+1n5GwWgP

Newsletter cover image
Why We Go to the Office Now
CEOs keep insisting that some of the best reasons to come back to the office are to reconnect with colleagues, meet in person again and have the kind of spontaneous interaction that boosts creativity, but new research finds that many returning employees just want to get their work done.
Sign up for the full edition of the Bloomberg Work Shift newsletter here for more takeaways, insights and data on the future of work.
“That's not what I expected,” said Janet Pogue McLaurin, the global director of workplace research at the architecture and design firm Gensler.
That also surprised me, yet “to focus on my work” was the answer ranked first with the majority of the 14,000 office workers Gensler surveyed in Canada, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the UAE and the US. Yes, there were exceptions — office workers in Mexico said the main reason to return to the office was for scheduled, in-person meetings with their teams while in the UK and Germany it was to sit with their team.
Still, the overarching results help explain why you may have noticed more space dedicated to concentration and privacy, such as phone booths or individual conferences rooms, at your office or those you’ve visited recently.
If you find yourself craving such spaces currently lacking in your workplace, chances are they may be coming in the future. While workers are coming back to the office — Gensler found that respondents said they need to be in the office 63% of the week to maximize productivity — they miss some aspects of working from home that they came to appreciate during the pandemic. The quiet and solitude to focus on the task at hand appears to be one of them.
The design features people want are quiet, technology-free zones and "libraries" as well as places to restore and connect like break rooms, outdoor and nap spaces, work cafes and fitness rooms, the survey showed.
This is a shortened edition of the Bloomberg Work Shift

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1llx+1n5GwWgP

Re: Fired non complier for refusing to come in? Was this person coming in at all?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ped+1n5GwWgP

Lol. Oriskany office is falling apart. Too many people told to go in and no desks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yil+1n5GwWgP

Not true, they fired a non complier last week bc they refused to come in. I heard others were fired for same as well. Other ppl were fired last week due to under performance and did not meet expectations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fth+1n5GwWgP

I don’t believe that all. Get in 3 days a week and get your classes done on time

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mtd+1n5GwWgP

This is what I am starting to believe. There are no parameters for the requirement. The lack of communication is insane, leads me to think the above is true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rbw+1n5GwWgP

Post a reply

: