Thread regarding Bank of America layoffs

Agile in Technology

Anyone else in technology agree that since we went to Agile, we NEVER get any "cool-down period". It's supposed to be in the "IP sprint", but we always use that to "make a date" that's been handed down to us from above. In the "waterfall" days, we had a "cool-down period" during code freeze.

In this article: "Strategies to vary pace, however, don’t need to be explicitly seasonal. The software development company Basecamp asks its employees to consolidate their work into cycles that last six to eight weeks and are focused on a small number of clear goals. Crucially, each cycle is followed by a two-week cool-down period in which employees can recharge and regroup by fixing small problems and taking time to consider what to tackle next. “It’s sometimes tempting to simply extend the cycles into the cool-down period to fit in more work,” the Basecamp employee handbook says. “But the goal is to resist this temptation.”"

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/opinion/creative-work-productivity-seasonality.html?smid=url-share

by
| 1183 views | | 11 replies (last February 25, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1r9lVeB6

11 replies (most recent on top)

Agile is another fad. It will be gone soon. Like jelly of the month club.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6mue+1r9lVeB6

@1xbi+1r9lVeB6 You just proved how useless SM/RTE positions are.
"It also can make life easier for supervisors, as instructions only have to last a couple of hours until the next scrum." So what do SM/RTE do outside of scrum calls? This is why many installations are moving from Scrum to Kanban.

Let's be honest here, observation and supervision have been in place even before Agile was introduced. Now, dev teams are experiencing burn out from Agile overkill.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4plw+1r9lVeB6

The Atlassian suite is a mess at best. I wonder how much commission someone got for selling that bottle of snake oil.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fql+1r9lVeB6

“Is it really the Agile process or all the MRA documentation that’s causing all the overhead?”

Actually, agile created the MRA mess. Development teams went wild west with agile. Documentation and requirements were thin. The result was a lot of implemented changes lacking requirement tracking, thorough testing, etc. It was comical and sad.

MRA became inevitable. Unfortunately, whomever came up with MRA’s solution didn’t do a great job. They forced a bad process into Jira. Honestly, do we have to submit a power point for designs? We couldn’t have leveraged confluence in some way? It’s a big fat mess and no one wants to implement any changes. And it’s becoming more and more expensive to do work.

GTO is in a death spiral. Less and less change with more and more overhead and exploding costs. Well done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mam+1r9lVeB6

Software developers, like others, are of variable quality. In waterfall, they are supposed to figure out what to do from specs. Not all are up to it, so Agile adds an increased level of observation and supervision. It also can make life easier for supervisors, as instructions only have to last a couple of hours until the next scrum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xbi+1r9lVeB6

"Agile is about creating non-essential positions in IT with no productive benefit to the end state."
It is a way to whip the employees. Then the employees learn to manipulate the agile process to make themselves look good which does not necessarily translate into a quality product. It turns the company into a Burger King.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dvw+1r9lVeB6

Is it really the Agile process or all the MRA documentation that’s causing all the overhead?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vqc+1r9lVeB6

Several years in and still no product owner for our team. That sums it up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mno+1r9lVeB6

The cooldown period is such a joke. We are forced to lower the points in the last sprint but it does change the load and hours in relaity. We are actually overworked because Agile became a project in itself (20% overhead). Agile is such a useless program. Too much pageantry. Too many ceremonies and ceremonial positions. Scrum Masters, RTE, simply asks ask for team progress. Unless they manage an AIT, the actual heavy lifting goes to the dev teams and PO. Such a waste,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @phq+1r9lVeB6

Agile is about creating non-essential positions in IT with no productive benefit to the end state. Just ask yourself on every call who are the participants and who are the spectators. You know who are the spectators as they do not contribute to the process. Just dead weight pretending to be important. There are a few benefits of Agile that can be used in Waterfall for a hybrid approach. In either principle, I agree on the cool down period to evaluate and correct immediate production issues after each install.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bsw+1r9lVeB6

Agile is all about turning people into machines

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ujb+1r9lVeB6

Post a reply

: