Thread regarding Bank of America layoffs

Do all mangers now manage by fear?

Is it my manager or everyone seeing the management by fear showing up at every turn.

It seems every manager I hear about are leading by fear or intimidation these days. No matter how good the group has done as a hole , coming in under budget , even managers that where the cool ones.. We remember the cool ones who left you alone as long as the work was getting done. Hell these days the work can get done early under budget everyone is happy and still we are talked down to. This new way of managing is not sitting well, maybe they are doing it to get people to quit so the layoff numbers will be lower.

Even the big boss used it in his all hands when he basically said- either you are just like this or your not employable by BofA anymore, referring to the HB2 law that was passed in NC (I think). As long as one comes in get his/her job done who cares what mold they are made out of.

by
| 1652 views | | 4 replies (last April 21, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+GWLvTyA

4 replies (most recent on top)

Bullying others to get ahead is definitely the dominant means that people are using now. It's quite suitable to the culture of fear that is being created. Professionalism and competence are thwarted when someone can just shout at you for no valid reason, without any misgivings or remorse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5pon+GWLvTyA

I have found in 40 years at corporate America, those managers who are insecure themselves manage this way. If you don't know how to do the job, bully someone else. The false assumption is that they look better when de-humanizing others.

One other observation is that good techies do not make good people managers, in general. There are rare exceptions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3znr+GWLvTyA

Mid-senior manager here in North Texas. most of the management staff I know, myself included, are trying to do the right thing by our employees. The thing is, a lot of (maybe most) are being purposefully left out of the loop on the many changes occurring. Just like our staff, we are afraid for ourselves and for those that report to us. And, like most everybody else, we are seeing colleagues that work hard and do a great job let go, re-orged out, or effectively demoted. The suspicion is that many of the changes - not all, but many - are in an effort to get us to quit. I think we can all agree that there is some low hanging fruit that can be plucked, but unfortunately, those individuals seem to stick around. Whether it is because they are paid less than more highly skilled or effective employees demand is up for debate, but I don't think it's out of the question. The focus on cost cutting has gotten excessive. There are efficiencies to capture, but unfortunately, I think the bank is going to long-term face serious brain drain. Those individuals most experienced and with the most desired skills can and will leave based on a culture of uncertainty, fear, and frustration. After years of stagnant salary increases, laughable bonuses, and fear, why would the most valued employees, who typically have greater mobility anyway, stay? Eventually all that will be left are those that can't find employment elsewhere or those that are too lazy to try. Rest assured original poster, some of us are doing our best to save our own jobs as well as yours and make things great, but it's certainly a difficult and uphill battle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mit+GWLvTyA

There are still some decent managers left. Mine's not a fear type. The issue is this is coming from the top. Brian doesn't want people. On more than one occasion, a senior manager (or even Brian himself) have voiced "If you don't like this, you can leave". That's the corporate motto now. At least I've heard that enough times from senior management. Work from home, HB2, whatever ... Leave if you don't like it.

I also heard rumblings that the bank was leaned on when it comes to hiring foreign workers. You may see some of the lower level guys from offshore get replaced.

So putting all that together, the bank would love to dump more of us for cheaper foreign folks. But it isn't politically acceptable right now. My guess you'll see fewer folks getting packages but management wants you miserable (or most of us anyway). That way they save on severance and reduce staff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zyb+GWLvTyA

Post a reply

: