Thread regarding Bank of America layoffs

Ex-Employee RIF'd at 56 Lacks Age Bias Claim

Old article worth reading...

Sept. 9 — A 56-year-old Bank of America Corp. employee terminated in a reduction in force has no Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim because he can't show the employer's asserted performance-based reasons for selecting him for the RIF were a pretext for age bias, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Sept. 5.

Affirming summary judgment for Bank of America, the court said John Delaney, who worked for Bank of America and its predecessors for 22 years before his termination, failed to raise a triable issue that age was the “but for” cause of his discharge.

Rather, the evidence supports Bank of America's explanation that managers selected Delaney for the RIF based on instructions to choose underperforming employees whose dismissal would have the least impact on the business, the court said.

....... more at www.bna.com/bank-america-employee-n17179894681

by
| 1836 views | | 2 replies (last July 14, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+TUEgYHu

2 replies (most recent on top)

Take it easy on the quotes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fkyt+TUEgYHu

The performance assessment is what is biased and is completely manipulated to achieve a "valid" layoff for "any" employee that a manager does not like or want any longer. The Performance Assessment is totally subjective and any objective metrics or data can be skewed according to any bias a manager has. So any strategic decisions based on this will ultimately be a "loss" for the organization. The organization has to "trust" its management however this is a tool that can be horrendously abused by poorly people skilled, incompetent managers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3nuu+TUEgYHu

Post a reply

: