Thread regarding Alphabet Inc. (Google) layoffs

PIPs Are Even Worse Now; Comp Discouraging

Hi,

Back in 2024, I wrote @OP+1tugivWq where I shared information on PIP changes at Google (as opposed to Alphabet). I felt it was appropriate to write an update for 2026.

First, let me be clear: This past GRAD results season appears to have been a massacre. In 2026, you got your bonus if you were still employed on March 1, 2026. Anecdotally, it seems February 2026 saw a surge of Googlers abruptly leave the company.

This is a continued trend from earlier. At one point, Google used to be more tolerant of employees who plausibly just had a poor performance review period. It is becoming more and more obvious that such tolerance is a thing of the past.

Okay, so you manage to get an S rating. In early March, you learn what your merit increase, bonus and equity refresh are. Based on pay comparison results and personally speaking with colleagues, it seems that the changes described in @OP+1jts0j95y (and kudos to that OP!) have been implemented: T got fantastic raises, O got good raises, S far smaller raises. Depending on where your old salary is in relation to the 2026 salary band for your level, your raise likely didn't beat inflation, if you got a raise at all. Yes, Virginia, there are definitely reports of Googlers who received $0 in base salary increases.

One thing I am trying to wrap my head around is the actual new PIP process. For those who went through it, can you reply with what you were offered? Were you even offered a chance to take a PIP? Did you get 60 days of garden leave? Can anyone say that my belief that those PIPed in 2026 didn't get a bonus is wrong?


by
| 1 view | | 7 replies (last 1 day ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kkqap1zm

7 replies (most recent on top)

as of 2026 Q1/Q2 Google is not offering PIPs - folks are being walked out

lots of management layers in Cloud
In Cloud there are literally a ladder of VPs reporting to VPs, Directors reporting to Directors - utter nonsense :-)
On weekly basis googlegeist being asked how quickly are we making decisions - hahaha!

middle management is super weak
everybody's afraid to lose their job
there's no internal vision for what/how AI will transform
half-baked AI tools are being shoved down folks throats - whether it makes sense or not
managers praise token burners - there's internal dash that shows which models you're using, tools, how you're compare to your colleagues, team, PA

bottom line - Google culture was lost several years back
2023 layoffs did a major damage

Google is bleeding talent - folks are walking out - for every high-profile published exit there's 50 more
Googlers are affraid to take initiative, creative risks

It's a shell of a company. great benefits - yes
great for a fresher
suffocating for a senior leader

the writing is on the wall - google is hiring in Bangalore overwhelmingly,

Hope this helps

thanks for listening to my vent session ;-)
peace out

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fg7+1kkqap1zm

@cm at best, your comment in @ab is simply disingenuous. at worst, it is outright trolling.

previously google made a choice of keeping someone who had a bad year because they have good institutional knowledge or otherwise performed well before, and now google is making the choice of cutting headcount by any means necessary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @27k+1kkqap1zm

@cf What I need are some facts here, from those who recently went through this process: Is Google offering garden leave or severance now for those presented with a PIP who do not go through with it? As of 2024, the answer was "yes, Google offers garden leave and severance" but what about in 2026?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1kkqap1zm

@ak
"But real talk: If you think strong software engineers never have a bad six months or a year, you are absurdly naive."

I don't know anything about software engineering, I'm just pointing out that it's fair for a company to expect employees to meet performance standards (even a despicable company like Google).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cm+1kkqap1zm

Google is catching with Meta in percentage of PIP and force employees to go without severance package.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cf+1kkqap1zm

"Google used to be more tolerant of employees who plausibly just had a poor performance review period. It is becoming more and more obvious that such tolerance is a thing of the past."

As it should be since it's a business, not a social service.

No one said it isn't.

But real talk: If you think strong software engineers never have a bad six months or a year, you are absurdly naive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1kkqap1zm

"Google used to be more tolerant of employees who plausibly just had a poor performance review period. It is becoming more and more obvious that such tolerance is a thing of the past."

As it should be since it's a business, not a social service.

And I say that with absolute disdain for this quasi government company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1kkqap1zm

Post a reply

: