Thread regarding Paramount Global layoffs

No merger before 2027

If even then. I'm starting to get a bit optimistic that this whole thing could fall through in the end.

https://www.engadget.com/2222897/paramount-agrees-to-delay-warner-bros-merger-into-2027/


by
| 13 views | | 8 replies (last 4 hours ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kyazfckm

8 replies (most recent on top)

Lol. The moment I see Bonta is involved, I know the whole lawsuit is just political nonsense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g2+1kyazfckm

For anyone confused about Paramount’s decision…
From a CNN article… “Paramount is saying “let’s go straight to trial in California District Court,” analyst Rich Greenfield of Lightshed Research said. Greenfield noted that “even if Paramount loses in District Court, this would accelerate the time frame for an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court and potentially to the Supreme Court in 2027.”

Anyone want to guess about the Supreme Court’s decision? And don’t worry, they’ll use that victory to recoup the $7 mil/day payout to the shareholders.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dk+1kyazfckm

It's probably a coincidence that only states with Democratic AGs are suing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @da+1kyazfckm

The billion dollar late fees for this deal are going to make this a disaster. The layoffs will be more hardcore than before just to pay for them…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d0+1kyazfckm

@a4 why would the states settle? what do they have to gain by settling? They’re not settling before September 30 unless something major happens like they break up the deal and then the whole deal will be changed.That $7mm fee per day is going to hurt and we all know how they’re going to absorb that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1kyazfckm

@OP No way it falls through. What Nepo Baby wants, Nepo Baby gets, and Uncle Don will clear the path.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1kyazfckm

@a4 i agree. it doesn't seems like the press (with few exceptions) bothered to read the text. But does this mean if the courts can decide by June 1, the states will have effectively dropped their case? This only benefits paramount. What do the states get out of it? Also, doesn't it cost a cr-p ton of money to keep playing lawyers on both sides? I guess they figured if they haven't won within a year, it's not worth pursuing?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1kyazfckm

That's not what it says. It says we are willing to wait that long. It's nothing more than a ploy to get the states to settle. The lawsuit is BS, and Paramount would sue the states to recover the quarterly fee they have to start paying to shareholders. If it went to June '27, that would be almost 2B dollars. The states will settle before 9/30; you can bet on it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kyazfckm

Post a reply

: