#leadership

Because what will Really get us out of this mess are more executives who lead by numbers and have no idea what an “SDLC” even is. yay.

Kevin Hart addressed recent reports about his media company, Hartbeat. He dismissed claims of internal turmoil and employee concerns as exaggerated. Hart called the company's restructuring a strategic business move. This action aims to maintain strong financial performance. He confirmed Hartbeat remains creatively active with its leadership intact.

https://thegrio.com/2026/05/26/kevin-hart-addresses-hartbeat-layoffs-restructuring/

Participation is optional. Answer any, all, or none of the questions. Totally anonymous.

Pinky promise.

Dell Quarterly Employee Survey
By the VP of Sarcasm and Irony

1. On a scale of 1 to 5, how excited are you to provide feedback that will be carefully reviewed, summarized, ignored, and filed away forever?

2. How confident are you that leadership already knows the survey results before you submit them?

3. Which follow-up action do you expect after this survey?

A. A thoughtful action plan
B. A vague email about “listening”
C. A slide deck proving engagement is up
D. Another survey asking why survey participation is down

4. How valued do you feel when management asks for honest feedback and then explains why your feedback is wrong?

5. What is the main purpose of this survey?

A. Improving the workplace
B. Measuring employee sentiment
C. Creating the appearance of concern
D. Supporting someone’s promotion packet

6. How much do you agree with this statement: “My feedback directly contributes to leadership bonuses, even if it contributes to nothing else.”

7. If this survey leads to action, which action is most likely?

A. More meetings
B. More dashboards
C. More corporate language
D. More reminders to complete the next survey

8. How safe do you feel being completely honest in an anonymous survey that somehow still knows your department, level, manager, location, and employee group?

9. Which phrase would you most like to see retired from the survey results email?

A. “We hear you”
B. “Actionable insights”
C. “You spoke, we listened”
D. “We are committed to transparency”

10. Would you recommend this survey to a coworker?

A. Yes, if they enjoy performance art
B. Yes, if they need a break from real work
C. No, but I’ll forward the reminder anyway
D. Only if leadership completes one too

I lifted this off Mattel's board as it was trending, I am claiming no credit but I do find it funny.

Just curious what the board thinks. Playing politics and maneuvering the convoluted organizational structures come to mind. A bit ruthlessness and narcissism helps too. What I noticed is that most of them like to hear sound of their own voice, I guess this can be rolled up as a subgroup under narcissism.

Noticed several different leaders (mostly Directors) had their title in Outlook/Teams changed to “CW Optum Business Leader-Requisition.”

Does anyone know what this means and if it has anything to do with impending layoffs?

time to replace our good old CTO. He is old and not performing optimal. He should be fired!!!!

Any Omni/operations leads finding themselves being the mod more than STL's?

The problem isn’t just one bad decision. It’s weak direction, poor follow through, and leadership that doesn’t inspire much confidence. Does anybody actually still see a future here?

I used to be the person who volunteered for extra assignments, who looked for ways to cut waste, who stayed late to get things across the finish line. Then I noticed that the people who did those things either burned out and left, or they got managed out by leaders who felt threatened by anyone who seemed too competent. Meanwhile, the people who just showed up, did exactly what they were told, and never rocked the boat were the ones who stuck around. This place doesn't want people who think or try. It wants people who nod and comply.

The only consistent message quarter to quarter is revenue declining faster than forecast. The stock price falling into the single digits says everything. If you’ve listened to this company’s analyst calls long enough you know management just pivots to whatever narrative works in the moment and they’re running out of narratives faster than revenue streams. Easily the worst management team this company has ever had.

Exactly what @aq+1kr2bpeh6 said.

I'm watching this happen right now with a person on my team who got bumped up two levels in less than a year. On paper, he looked great, lots of years in the industry, confident in interviews, talked a big game about process improvement. In practice, he doesn't understand the basics of what we do, he's broken two different workflows because he changed things without asking, and the rest of us spend about five hours a week quietly undoing his mistakes. The person who promoted him clearly didn't do any real checking. Now the rest of us are paying for it, and the guy himself is clearly stressed and embarrassed. It's a failure at every level and it happens here constantly.

I’ve never worked at a company that changes course as much as this one, constantly chasing whichever way the wind happens to be blowing, whether politically or technologically. One minute it’s one strategy, the next it’s the complete opposite, like nobody even remembers what they were pushing six months ago.

Anything to the rumor that she will leave in the next 3-6 months?

The unstable ship continues listing. Now Manifold is out, another leader thrown to the bin due to unacceptable conduct. No way to have a successful business with this many hands grabbing the wheel in such a short time.

We’re having faster turnover than the UK PM. Enough of this Euro lunacy, time to return our strength.

Management said that people are more productive at the office. Why would they start telling the truth now? Senior leaders are as trustworthy as a politician.

DF is responsible

That's the post.

OK Five9. Let’s use the rest of 2026 and show this industry that we have what it takes to get past the misdirection of previous leadership.

I want to see success for the Five9, the employees, and let’s be honest; I just want to prove all these ill spoken people on this forum wrong!!

I know there are pro Five9 employees that read these updates. I would love to hear from more of you.

All anybody cares about here is making more money for those on top. We're not even an afterthought.

Remember when the cows wandered into EMHC last year and security didn’t even bother to send a fake “your safety matters” email? I’m convinced they went straight to Darren’s room, took one look at him, and were like, “Ah. You’ve got this ” and just left. Honestly, what else could their visit have been for.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2026-05-20/ceos-at-novo-nestle-push-work-cultures-into-results-mode

Any word on if there’s going to go thru with in in New England? Should be soon, the higher ups are in for a surprise if they do. A lot of good talent will be leaving from what I hear..what a joke, let’s make this like 2005 and put these managers in the spotlight and talk about their cr-p numbers that we can easily look up. I can see director and above but individual managers !? Bye bye verizon for many if this happens

Will AI replace Dan and his leadership team? 😅

I feel like they were once sent out every trimester, results were shared by department GPs, and leaders attempted accountability of results. Is there anything now to hold ELT and other leaders accountable? Or did the results get so ugly that they stopped allowing upward feedback? When is the last time survey results were shared?

This should be entertaining

Zero or paltry raises for employees while executives gorge themselves and continually inflate their compensation year over year.

Whatever happens, don't blame yourselves. This isn't about you. It's about greed and poor leadership.

Makes you wonder if the goal is just to burn the place down. Specialists, veterans, people with actual skills, the ones who held teams together - they're all getting cut. Any leadership that cared about the future would be doing everything to keep them.

To those posting positively about hiring and growth at OpenText on the threads here.

Please do a reality check on how things actually are here and across the industry. If you haven’t done your own research, ask around. Plenty of people will give you an honest picture.

If you know the reality and choose to ignore it, at least don’t mislead others. Stop posting overly optimistic takes about job openings or “returning to growth” when most people here see it differently.

From the recent all-hands and CEO town hall, many of us felt the leadership lacked ownership and accountability. Questions were deflected to the ELT, and there was no clear stand on strategy, growth, or revenue only focus on personal incentives.

The concern is real: without change, OpenText risks hurting both its financials and its people.

If you disagree, back it up with facts. Otherwise, it’s time to face reality.

With so many associates gone, who exactly are all these managers, senior managers, directors, senior directors, and VPs leading now? The teams that remain are extremely lean. It’s hard to understand why leadership layers continue to stay intact while cuts are happening primarily at the lower levels. At some point, you have to question whether all of these layers were necessary to begin with, especially now.

Appian has changed over all senior leadership in the past two years. Except for the founders, of course.

In that time Appian has lost 1/3 of its value, while industry peers like PEGA and even the broader enterprise software ETF stocks (IGV) have gained 12-14%.

There’s nobody left to blame but yourselves. You aren’t good at your jobs. You can’t hire well. You can’t run a company well. You’re in over your heads but are too arrogant to see it. You’ve done your best to force alignment under a single old strategy… silencing any challenge to the boss. It’s not working.

Cash out. Let new people run this institution. Or continue to flush value down the drain,

It's what...nearly two years since he was brought in as the technology executive management team member to fix Citi's age old problems. What/How has he delivered so far? Considering what his directs (forget the whole team) costs Citi? What's the ROI?

Biggest question to answer - Would Citi ever be in a position to exit the CO had it not been some other administration in place (either Republican different than Pres. Trump or a Dem Pres.)? If the answer is no, then is it not clear that Tim Ryan has failed misreably at his job? 2 years is a long time at that level. Then again....CO was issued under Jane's watch and her total comp and position has only climbed higher and higher every year, despiteg Citik having paid nearly half a billion dollars in just fines since the 2020 CO. She's costed Citi more than that already...she ain't in any position to hold Tim accountable for anything

Has anyone else had the experience of just not being able to cope with the persistent concerns of both not being able to keep up, plus the feeling that their own impending notice is a forgone conclusion, just waiting to happen?

Several months ago, I had so much anxiety, over my VP having an ongoing conniption fit over the set of metrics my team produced, not "aligning" to the "strategic message" being tried to "crafted", for an "incredibly important executive meeting"; that I worked myself up into such a panic, that I got in an automobile accident. I'm not saying the accident was 100% due to my state of paranoid stupidity at the time, but it was a major contributing factor.

My spouse ordered me to go to the doctor, and I broke down on how much of a mess I was psychologically. My spouse explained to the doctor, on how I was a completely different person than I was years ago. We went over life's issues, and framed out how I got here; and surprise, one of the biggest root cause issues was deemed to be my ongoing fear of being restructured.

The doctor placed me on several medications, several for anxiety, and several because since working my behind off for the past few years, my behind has grown to twice its original pre-Cisco size, due to a healthy diet of carbs and sugary Starbucks drinks.

I've been on these meds for several months, and am loosing weight. I feel much better, but to be completely honest; I know longer give a crud about this place. I don't like the people I work with, I really do not like my leadership. I don't know why I believed for a long time, that this was a fantastic place to work. It su-ks.

We have talked it over, and am going to try to stay as long as I can. It is refreshing to not care. Yes, I will do the work, be expect the bare minimum.

Sad because this company is being ruined by the greed of a small population of enabled executives, who just don't care to slice of whatever population of employees are needed to make their pockets fill up even faster, for the sake of the AI evolution.

If you don't like the message above, well aren't you just living with your head in the sand. Hopefully our paths won't cross, because I don't want to work with you, or worst, for you.

It sounds like there was an email from higher ups admitting some kind of fault or issues? Any details for the laid off among us?

To reframe an old adage for the ongoing disasters being inflicted on our companies:
“We the unwilling, led by the uninformed, guided by the blind, are kept busy by those incapable of recognizing value-adding results.

With Cisco losing market share, the responsibilities of that are squarely on the portfolio leaders, AVPs, SEDs, ODs, SSEMs, RMs, and SEMs. They have failed to hold their people accountable. Due to the failure of these so called leaders, good people have been impacted and will continue to be impacted. The answer cannot be to just add portfolio AEs and SEs. It is time to LR the portfolio leaders with real leaders that can lead the business and hold people accountable.