#ai

Posts mentioning hashtag #ai

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #ai.

Mention #ai in your post to continue the discussion!

More layoff 4Q 2025

From Reuters

Wells Fargo: severance likely to rise in fourth quarter
Bank will roll out AI gradually over the next year and beyond
More efficiencies to come from AI, CEO says
Dec 9 (Reuters) - Wells Fargo (WFC.N), opens new tab expects more cuts to its workforce and sees higher severance expenses in the current fourth quarter, CEO Charlie Scharf said on Tuesday, adding that artificial intelligence was set to change the way its business works.
"We have gone through the budgeting process, and even pre-artificial intelligence, we do expect to have less people as we go into next year," Scharf said on the sidelines of a Goldman Sachs financial services conference.


Updated intelligence on Walmart layoffs

We don’t expect significant layoffs before end of financial year (Jan 31st). 3Q was good, stock is up and the holiday event seems to be going fine.

Evaluations continue on where AI can be implemented, although progress is slow due to backlog and inability of the tech side to implement and put into production old projects that have languished. Some will be canceled.

Evaluation time is coming up for salary associates so we’ll see the normal reductions based on performance starting March/April.

Probably no significant workforce reductions until the May time frame. Once the new CEO is installed, it’s likely we’ll see some tech leadership turnover to increase focus on project delivery and stability.

We believe several areas are probably safe from the potential 2Q reductions, such as transportation, vision and store staffing. Expect a focus on market management and merchant areas with potential AI solutions to streamline the business side and a renewed emphasis on first to market activities.

We think the biggest resource impact could still be in tech but not until 2Q.


2025 Employee of the year: Eliza

What a joke.

An hour of how great Eliza is. Just come out and tell us that within a few years, we will all be without a job because your precious AI bot will be doing it all.

Hey RV, I think your girl Eliza left a little something on your chin. Might wanna wipe that off


Automation & AI are ending LVL1 Support Jobs

DTC Dells how to follow along is ending all LVL 1 support positions here shortly. They did a massive push on BPO companies servicing dell clients where they were not required to have formal training on TECH so they could follow a flow chart on NBA. This will be the death of quite a few jobs for the industry if others adopt.


Tinkering

I was doing some tinkering with AI and thought to share:

⭐ 3. Set internal boundaries with AI pressure and dashboards

Dashboards are not reality.
AI promises are not reality.
The “push of a button” narrative is not reality.

But your body reacts like they are threats.

To protect yourself, create a mental mantra:

“Leadership’s metrics are not my emergency.”

Repeat it when:
• deadlines shift
• new reviews drop suddenly
• AI hype creates worker panic
• leadership frames scarcity as urgency

Your job is to contribute — not to sacrifice your health for an algorithm.


It’s the end of Oracle

OpenAI won’t deliver $100B to Oracle, struggling itself. So no backlog no pay off of data center nor Stargate. The apps are being replaced by smaller SaaS solutions much cheaper. The AWS and Google connection ki-ls the rest multi cloud. AI theme is not financially valid and AI agents in Apps are just another feature. Nobody new buys apps because AI agents… that’s true.
Time will tell.


IBM Nears Roughly $11 Billion Deal for Confluent

$11B? Who wants to hazard a guess as to how AK is going to pay for this?

https://www.wsj.com/business/deals/ibm-nears-roughly-11-billion-deal-for-confluent-276f52d8

Deal for data-infrastructure company could come as soon as Monday

By: Lauren Thomas
Dec. 7, 2025 10:01 pm ET

International Business Machines IBM is in advanced talks to acquire data-infrastructure company Confluent CFLT for around $11 billion, according to people familiar with the matter.

The details

A deal could be announced as soon as Monday, the people said, cautioning that the talks could still fall apart.

Confluent had a market value of around $8 billion as of Friday, while IBM’s was around $290 billion.

Confluent provides technology that helps manage streams of real-time data used in big artificial-intelligence models. An AI bo-m has boosted the need for its capabilities from companies in sectors including retail, technology and financial services.

The context

An acquisition of Confluent would be the biggest deal for IBM in recent memory as it repositions its business around AI.

Last year, it agreed to buy cloud-software provider HashiCorp for $6.4 billion, in a deal that pushed it further into fast-growing cloud and AI offerings.

In October, IBM posted higher revenue in the third quarter, boosted by higher-than-expected growth in its consulting business. IBM in November said it would lay off thousands of employees before the end of the year, joining other technology companies that are repositioning themselves in the age of artificial intelligence.

IBM has been competing with Google, Microsoft and a number of startups to build computers that exceed the abilities of the best conventional ones. It is working on larger clusters of quantum chips that it expects will enable large-scale computing in the next five years.

Chief Executive Arvind Krishna recently said IBM has used AI—specifically AI agents—to replace the work of a couple of hundred human-resources workers. That has enabled it to hire more programmers and salespeople.

Technology has been one of the busiest sectors for dealmaking this year. Google parent Alphabet struck a $32 billion deal for cybersecurity startup Wiz. Palo Alto Networks agreed to a $25 billion deal for CyberArk. And Salesforce struck an $8 billion deal for data-management software firm Informatica.


It boggles the mind that anyone bought into the whole AI nonsense

I’d love to know how much money is being burned on that hallucinating mess, and how many people were pushed out specifically “because of AI.” Sure, most cuts were really about offshoring, but some people absolutely were replaced in the name of AI, and the productivity expectations tied to it keep creeping up. It’s about time people noticed that, in most cases, AI just drains time and energy. Replace people? Good luck relying on a machine that can’t give you the same answer twice.


Dear Nike Board of Directors

Are you reading the posts on this forum? Do you care about the health of this company? As a shareholder, I do. You don’t need to hire a multimillion dollar consulting firm to diagnose the situation and put a plan in place. A rational person and a little GenAI can summarize the themes for you

Key Themes
• Organizational instability: Employees cite constant reorganizations—often every six months—which has created fatigue, confusion, and a sense that structural decisions are being driven by short-term pressures rather than a long-term plan.
• Talent decisions undermining trust: There are repeated concerns that recent layoffs and promotions didn’t align with performance, with high performers cut while lower performers remained due to internal politics or legacy relationships.
• Leadership and HR gaps: Employees point to inconsistent leadership quality, slow or overly procedural HR processes, and communication missteps around sensitive changes. Some comments note ineffective leaders remaining in place despite clear issues.
• Burnout and morale decline: Workloads are heavy, career mobility feels limited, and many employees describe being exhausted and discouraged. Morale appears fragile, and trust in leadership is weakened.
• Impact on innovation: Several threads reference a shift from leading the market to following it. Internal volatility is viewed as slowing decision-making and diluting the creative culture that historically fueled Nike’s brand strength.

Implications
Left unaddressed, these issues create material risks: higher attrition among top performers, slower innovation cycles, reduced productivity, and a culture that becomes increasingly difficult to repair.

Recommendations for Consideration
• Stabilize the organization by pausing major reorgs and aligning on a multi-year structural plan.
• Audit recent layoffs and promotion decisions to rebuild confidence in fairness and performance alignment.
• Strengthen leadership accountability through clearer expectations and more rigorous capability reviews.
• Address burnout by examining workload models, spans of control, and internal mobility pathways.
• Recommit to innovation by protecting creative/product teams from ongoing churn and simplifying decision processes.

Nike’s external brand remains incredibly strong, but the internal signals point to a need for stability, clearer leadership alignment, and a renewed focus on innovation. Addressing these areas will help rebuild trust and set the foundation for long-term growth.


Is San Luis Obispo County ready for the potential AI-driven job losses?

AI now affects one in four jobs worldwide and could trigger the largest workforce displacement in modern history. An estimated 30–50% of office jobs may be replaced or heavily reshaped within five years. Are we prepared? Are our leaders prepared? Do we have a plan to retrain workers for the new labor market?

https://www.sanluisobispo.com/opinion/readers-opinion/article313429763.html


Why did we lay off so many people in AI if we're now doing this?

Meta has acquired AI-wearables startup Limitless, maker of a pendant-style device that records and transcribes real-world conversations, as the social media giant doubles down on efforts to build AI-enabled consumer hardware.

https://www.reuters.com/business/meta-acquires-ai-wearables-startup-limitless-2025-12-05/


Barron's article:

Verizon’s Mass Layoffs Were ‘Inevitable,’ CEO Says. What the Telecom Wants to Do in 2026. By Karishma Vanjani - Dec 05, 2025, 4:49 pm EST

Verizon announced its largest-ever round of layoffs, cutting thousands of jobs last month. Now the telecom’s new CEO is explaining the cuts—and laying out the path forward for remaining workers.

Chief Executive Daniel Schulman hosted a live all-hands employee webcast on Friday, the company’s first since announcing it’s shedding more than 13,000 jobs. Holding a cup and wearing a dark shirt while standing in front of the red Verizon logo, Schulman was blunt. A video of the webcast was seen by Barron’s.

“We’ve lost like 500 to 700 basis points of market share in the last five years,” Schulman said. “And by the way, that puts pressure on a lot of things. It puts pressure on our revenue. It means we have to compete harder. We start raising rates and when we start raising rates, you start irritating customers big time. They start churning. Like our churn is up like 20, 25 basis points since we started raising rates.”

Customer satisfaction scores are also not great, according to Schulman. “They are worse than our competitors,” he said, adding that the fault is partly Verizon’s. The telecommunications giant didn’t offer employees the “financial flexibility” to get things done, he said.

“A lot of it is self-inflicted wounds. A lot of it,” Schulman said.

The decision on mass layoffs was “inevitable,” according to Schulman, “because if we don’t have enough money to put back into our value proposition to customers, we are going to continue to shrink.” Making small cuts would have meant doing something quite large later on, he added.

Schulman said he presented the company’s 2026 turnaround plan during his first board meeting as CEO this past week, and has plans to detail it the next time he talks to the Street, a likely reference to analysts who cover the company. Schulman will probably share more during Verizon’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Jan. 27.

Verizon didn’t immediately respond to Barron’s request for comment on the plan or the layoffs.

Investors, however, can put together some clues. In late October, Schulman said he intends to use “AI as a key tool to simplify offers.”

That same month, Schulman said in a call with employees, according to a transcript reviewed by Barron’s, that “a lot of the friction occurs because we’re so complex. Like we have so many different promotions out there.”

Verizon will also likely make customer service a focal point in the new year. Schulman, who called himself an overachiever and an upfront man in Friday’s webcast, shared a story of a terminally ill cancer patient who he personally contacted after the man reached out trying to disconnect his Verizon plan.

“Everybody gets terrible customer service across every industry, it’s so bad right now out there. And what if we empowered our reps to do the right thing,” Schulman said.

Verizon has its work cut out for itself. Having a good network connection is no longer a differentiator—and that is forcing the telecom to try to find another way to standout amid a competitive landscape. Shares have taken a beating: Under former CEO Hans Vestberg, who will now serve as a special advisor until October 2026, Verizon stock fell 15%. Shares have dropped 6% over the past three months.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or Ebitda, largely remained stable under Vestberg, who took the reins in mid 2018. Ebitda in 2024 was $48.8 billion, up from $47.2 billion in 2019.

The latest Thanksgiving was strong, Schulman said during the webcast. Separately, he said he sees an opportunity in helping hyperscalers—large cloud service providers—connect to data centers.

Schulman wished his employees happy holidays at the end of the webcast. “Don’t forget about finishing the fourth quarter strong,” he said.

Paywalled: https://www.barrons.com/articles/verizon-layoffs-ceo-stock-price-1e8ee33f
Paywall Removed: https://archive.is/XvQ4k

Comments:
Scott Colebank
Many investors remain in this stock because the dividend yield is appealing and the company has a long record of increasing its payout. With a new CEO taking over, there is uncertainty about how highly he prioritizes maintaining or growing the dividend as he works to turn the company around.

Whitham Reeve
Both the CEO and the company have avoided addressing the dividend directly. This silence is viewed by some investors as a sign that management may consider cutting or reducing the dividend without drawing attention to it.

CM C
The incoming leadership appears to be focusing on operational discipline, which is overdue. Schulman faces the challenge of repairing an organization that, under Vestberg, struggled with efficiency. The previous leadership period included high capital spending, unnecessary complexity across business units, and frequent strategy changes that diluted focus. Vestberg also earned eight figure compensation despite weak performance, which frustrated many shareholders.

Bill Letson
As wireless service becomes more like a commodity, carriers often engage in price competition to retain or attract customers. This compresses margins and can erode long term value. Because of this dynamic, the commenter sees Verizon as a value trap, meaning the stock appears cheap but may not deliver meaningful upside.

MATTHEW MENENEBERG
This user experienced billing issues in which Verizon added charges for services that were not requested. Removing these charges took months and no refund was provided for the incorrect billing period. Because of the frustration and lack of customer care, they plan to leave Verizon soon.

Houyhnhnm GT
The commenter has been a long term holder who has waited through multiple promises of improvement. The ongoing lack of meaningful progress has tested their patience, and they plan to give the company only one more year before selling if results fall short again.

George Vernile
This investor highlights the substantial dividend income they receive, about four thousand dollars every quarter. They remain committed to holding the stock because the steady income is valuable to their portfolio.


January layoffs in the works....

Get ready folks, here comes another round... Pipeline is crawling, lots of folks on the bench... But wait, we spent a lot of money on SalesForce!! Just helps to show how bad it is, quicker and more efficiently. Can't fire people quick enough to save $$$. Let's fire more hard working Americans and move those roles offshore, stat! AAR please! Cause none of us have served in the military, but we did this really cool thing at West Point and like to believe that we really are tough, like rugged man tough and we got a T-shirt and love to add it to our linkedin profile, cause you know, it makes us look tough. Did I mention how rough and tough we are?

Solutions Integrator <---- Failed
VAR <---- Abandoned the back bone to chase a field of dreams
AI Super Star <---- Not really, but it sounds cool, like cool cool
Dud <---- Current state of affairs

All the execs are trying to get their buddies into the CEO role to save their behinds. Hey, I know let's hire more of the Lequin family to come and help out.. cause as you know, they crush quota! Hahahahah

If you invested funds in Insight five years ago, you only got a 17% return. Wow, those are some stats to brag about around the Christmas dinner table. Hey, we salvaged 1/3 rd of market cap to boot in only 2 years. Man, I can't wait to tell the kids. He-l, I think that I will be writing a book, doing a podcast, a vlog and well just telling the world how awesome we are. I just bought 20 more pieces of that awesome Fuchsia clothing to show just how much I love this place.

Make sure that you kiss a lot of behind to not get the boot on January 5th. Or just call yourself a CTO or CISO, since we have unlimited number of those around here and you'll be safe.


AI GENERATED MEETING NOTES : ALL HANDS

*. DAN LIKES TO SIP COFFEE LOUDLY INTO HIS MIC

*. DON'T BE LATE TO DAN'S MEETING BY EVEN 1 MINUTE. BUT EXPECT HIM TO HAVE AWKWARD LONG PAUSES DURING HIS MEETING CAUSING HIM TO GO OVER BY THREE MINUTES.

*. AI AND ROBOTS WILL TAKE OUR JOBS.

*. DAN WANTS TO REVOLUTIONIZE VZ WITH AI. BUT HE DOESN'T DON SLACK AND HE PREFERS LETTERS.

*. EVERYTHING ABOUT HAN'S VERIZON WAS HORRIBLE INCLUDING PERFORMANCE, CULTURE, EMPLOYEES. THE BOARD MEMBERS WERE EXCELLENT HOWEVER.

*. AI IS


India/offshore didn't take our Jobs. Executives/shareholders GAVE our jobs away.

Don't get me wrong, there definitely was nepotism and racism with hiring inside orgs, namely IT, but this all started long before any of that. The C-level all across the US, not just Verizon, sold us out. Not the people working to live in other countries. Yet, somehow we want to blame the lower working people. Continue to be lied to, live in ignorance and be exploited. God help the next generation that will have to live through the same lies they spin-doctor with AI (once it's matured to be production ready).


AI - Winter is coming!

Artificial Intelligence is being promoted as the next great engine of prosperity. AT&T, like many others, insists that AI will be a job creator, a force that opens new opportunities and drives innovation. But let’s be honest. If AI is as successful as its architects hope, it will never generate more jobs than it destroys.

The entire purpose of AI investment is efficiency. It is designed to automate, to optimize, to eliminate human error, and ultimately to eliminate human labor. If after billions in research and infrastructure AI does not eliminate millions of jobs, it will be judged a failure. That is the paradox. Success for AI means displacement on a scale society has never seen.

This is not alarmism. It is simple math. Every breakthrough in automation has reduced the need for human workers. AI is not just another tool. It is a general-purpose technology capable of replacing cognitive, creative, and managerial tasks once thought untouchable. When machines can write, analyze, negotiate, and even empathize, what remains for us?

The consequences go far beyond unemployment statistics. Work is not just a paycheck. It is the backbone of civil society. It structures our days, gives us purpose, and ties us to communities. Strip away meaningful employment for millions, and you do not just create economic instability. You unravel the social fabric itself.

If AI succeeds, we face a collapse of civil society:

  • Mass displacement of workers across industries, not only manufacturing but also white-collar and professional roles
  • Erosion of identity and purpose as people lose the roles that anchor them in society
  • Concentration of wealth and power as the benefits of AI accrue to a handful of corporations and investors
  • Political instability as inequality deepens and trust in institutions evaporates

We cannot afford to be lulled by glossy promises of “new jobs” or “reskilling.” History shows that the jobs created by automation are fewer, more specialized, and often inaccessible to those displaced. The scale of AI disruption will dwarf past industrial revolutions.

This is not a distant future. It is unfolding now. The urgency is real. If we do not confront the societal consequences head-on, we risk trading human dignity for technological progress. And that is not progress at all. It is collapse.


🧐AI focuses on #Layoffs when asked about #Avaya News

Grok Avaya Update December 2025
-- Quoting a November 2025 discussion board that details about 19 U.S.-based cuts on November 17, attributed to leadership decisions and talent exodus in sales and design teams.
-- Avaya, a communications software firm, has executed multiple workforce reductions in 2025, including voluntary exit packages in September and over 30% staff cuts at its India hub in October, amid restructuring post-2023 bankruptcy
-- A separate Union-employee specific layoff announcement from October targets an unspecified number effective December 8, 2025, reflecting ongoing cost pressures in the #cloud and #AI-driven tech sector despite $1 billion annual revenue.


Quantum Lays Off 1.5K In Cali

Quantum Corp. Sheds 1,500 Jobs Amid AI-Driven Restructuring

  • TechCrunch
    Dec 3, 2025, 9:30 AM PT
  • Quantum Corp., a leading innovator in AI, announced a significant reduction in its global workforce today, impacting approximately 1,500 employees. The company stated the layoffs are part of a strategic restructuring effort aimed at streamlining operations and shifting focus towards advanced AI development. This move follows a period of aggressive hiring but also increasing automation within its software and data departments. Affected employees will receive severance packages, outplacement services, and extended benefits. Analysts suggest this trend reflects a broader industry pattern where AI advancements are leading to efficiency gains at the cost of human jobs.
    https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/03/quantum-corp-layoffs-ai-restructuring/

Will this news grinch any SAP executive holiday parties?

Salesforce Inc. gave an outlook for revenue in the current period that topped analysts’ estimates, suggesting the software company is persuading customers to buy its AI tools.

Revenue will be $11.1 billion to $11.2 billion in the period ending in January, the company said Wednesday in a statement. Analysts, on average, estimated $10.9 billion. Current remaining performance obligations, a measure of bookings, will increase about 15%, compared with analysts’ estimates of a 10% rise.

The revenue forecast includes 3 percentage points of growth from Informatica, a data integration software maker that Salesforce acquired last month in an $8 billion deal. The outlook for current remaining performance obligations includes 4 percentage points from Informatica.

The largest maker of software to track customer relationships is trying to push adoption of Agentforce — its AI tool that can complete tasks such as sales development and customer service without human supervision. Still, use has been largely limited to experimentation, in part due to customer confusion over pricing and disorganized data, wrote Derrick Wood, an analyst at TD Cowen, ahead of earnings.

Salesforce Chief Executive Officer Marc Benioff touted adoption of the AI tool, saying “our Agentforce and Data 360 products are the momentum drivers.”

Agentforce launched last year, and the company said it has closed more than 9,500 paid deals since then, an increase from 6,000 in the prior quarter.Annual recurring revenue for Salesforce’s division that includes AI-focused tools such as data organization and agents was $1.4 billion in the period ended Oct. 31, the company said.

The shares gained about 8% in extended trading after closing at $238.72 in New York. The stock has dropped 29% this year through Wednesday’s close as investors have grown concerned about AI disrupting incumbent application software makers.

In the fiscal third quarter, Salesforce reported that revenue increased 8.6% to $10.3 billion. Profit, excluding some items, was $3.25 per share. Analysts, on average, estimated adjusted earnings of $2.86 a share on $10.3 billion revenue, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The current remaining performance obligation was $29.4 billion, while analysts expected $29.1 billion.

Earnings, excluding some items, will be $3.02 a share to $3.04 a share in the period ending in January. Analysts, on average, estimated $3.03.

For the full year ending in January, adjusted operating margin will be about 34%, in line with estimates.


Snowflake Q3 Earnings Preview: AI opportunities and new customer growth in focus

From Seeking Alpha on Snowflake trading at 267 today.

Wall Street expects the cloud-based data storage company to post an EPS of $0.31, implying a 55% increase, while revenue is expected to rise 25.3% to $1.18 billion for the quarter.

The company, during its Q2 earnings call, stated that it expects Q3 product revenue to come in between $1.125 billion and $1.13 billion.

We expect this to support NRR around ~125% and healthy new customer growth of +18-19% YoY,” Oppenheimer analyst Ittai Kidron highlighted in a research note.

Over the last two years, SNOW has beaten EPS estimates 88% of the time and has beaten revenue estimates 100% of the time.

Over the last three months, EPS estimates have seen four upward revisions and one downward move, while revenue estimates have seen eight upward revisions, compared to one downward revision.

Since the start of the year, SNOW shares have gained over 70%, compared to nearly 16% rise in the broader S&P 500 index.


Has anyone actually seen a working AI product here that customers actually use?

All this hype and push around AI has been going on for over a year now. What all do we have to show for it besides people posting that they did the AI dojo on LinkedIn, and some sloppy chat bot POC's that read internal documentation?

All this talk about agents and an AI future seems like a complete scam with no basis.


AI is a banking bust.

I don’t know where it started but someone in the banking sector painted a picture with golden rainbow of return via AI. All the banks all jumped on board with such a claim so as to not be left out.

Well its not panned out for any of them at all. Now, to make the shareholders happy $ has to be found. It’ll be done by way of layoffs. The first quarter of next year for all banks will be a bloodbath. All banks that made AI promises will be passing out pink slips left and right.


Financial AI is a bust.

I don’t know where it started but someone in the banking sector painted a picture with golden rainbow of return via AI. All the banks all jumped on board with such a claim so as to not be left out.

Well its not panned out for any of them at all. Now, to make the shareholders happy $ has to be found. It’ll be done by way of layoffs. The first quarter of next year for all banks will be a bloodbath. All banks that made AI promises will be passing out pink slips left and right.


AK on AI

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna argues that at current infrastructure and energy costs there is effectively no way for the current wave of AI data center spending to earn an adequate return. Using back-of-the-envelope math, he estimates about 80 billion dollars to build and fill a 1 gigawatt data center, implying around 8 trillion dollars in total commitments if the world builds roughly 100 gigawatts of AI compute capacity.
• He says 8 trillion dollars of capex would require roughly 800 billion dollars of profit just to cover the cost of capital, and notes that AI chips depreciate over about five years, meaning they must be heavily utilized and then replaced, further straining economics.
• Krishna openly disagrees with Sam Altman’s belief that such spending will be paid back, framing it as a belief or bet rather than something he accepts.
• He is very skeptical that current large language model technology alone will reach AGI, putting the probability at only 0 to 1 percent without a new breakthrough. He thinks AGI will require additional technologies, such as combining LLMs with more structured or hard knowledge, and even then calls it only a “maybe.”
• Despite this, he is bullish on present-day AI, saying current tools can unlock trillions of dollars of productivity in enterprises, even if they fall short of true AGI.