#management

Posts mentioning hashtag #management

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #management.

Mention #management in your post to continue the discussion!

Us versus them

There are a number of posts on this site - possibly all by the same person - that make it sound like management is out to sc--w over the workers.
Let me assure you, most managers hate this process. Sure, there are a small number of easy decisions and obvious low performers, but most of the decisions that need to be made are heartbreaking.
Worst of all, no manager wants less people, especially when they know they still have to do the same amount of work as before.
Quit with the comments about no compassion and bad leaders. This su-ks for everyone.


DXC shares

Looking at the DXC share price. Fair to say it's seen better days, I'm losing money If I current withdraw, but I risk losing it all going the way we are. What's people thoughts? Can management fix this ? Currently sitting at a 30%-40% loss with the share incentive program, and risk losing more if I withdraw due to tax but would rather have something, id even gamble it at this rate.


Should I quit ford ?

Ford work culture is decorated fully. All the high performing engineers are sidelined or made quit and ford management mostly promoting or favoring pets who are good at showcasing. I got few offers outside? This c×× nonsense is in big mess ? No way management is listening in anything. I want opnion other seniors who are at ford. I am at my mid level career now. Do you think it is high time to leave ford ? Or should wait things will change for good?


L3Harris e3 project submitted by me a loyal diehard corporate yes man employee!

So in the spirit of this website that focus on company layoffs I wanted to run what I done to my fellow loyal, dedicated, hardworking L3Harriss co-workers.

I'll try an be brief an get to the point. After attending multiple sessions of L3Harriss A.I. event week a light bulb instantly went off in my head. I said umm since I have extensive continuous improvement experience why don't I submitt this great cost savings ideal via L3Harris e3 program. So I did just that. What did I do you ask? Well I basically submitted a cost savings project where I projected the company can save easily 25 million or more a year and not skip a beat. Basically I submitted a cost savings project that replaces from the CEO of L3Harris all the way down to lower and middle level mangers. This also include all of H.R. department, EHS, Finance, and especially the absolute most worthless position ever created the dam program management department. I said in a few sentences that after attending the A.I. event and some of my own personal use of A.I. software well this technology is now ready to replace all of the forementioned positions/management/departments! They are all manily indirect charging and absolutely bring no tangible value into design, engineer, manufacturing and or testing of hardware/products. Therefore all of these positions can be replaced with? YOU GUESSED RIGHT A.I. BABY!
Now if you still reading let me explain. Without exposing to much about me I am an experienced degreed engineer with multiple years under my belt. I have set up private machine shops with different types of cnc machines and other supporting processing type equipment to be fully automated where only one experienced person can operate everything remote with very minimal human interaction. No HR, management, program management etc is on site or is even needed. Now yes these are smaller facilities and more dealing with high volume production components but this can apply to other manufacturing scenarios to a certain degree.

So to end my rant the point I am making is us real workers who brings true value to the company should say hey upper management please explain to us what justification can you provide to justify your salary because A.I. can easily do your job for the cost of a software engineer who can create an A.I. agent that can literally replace you. If this was a good ideal or stupid comment below as I value your opinion.


Directors have too much power

My manager got demoted to IC and their direct reports were moved under the director (by the director themselves). How come the director has this much power? Why are the directors never demoted?

I like my manager much better than the director.

Now the director will have around 30 direct reports which is suspiciously high number. Looks like many people in my team will get laid off eventually.


Technology SLT Shuffle - When and who will win?

It’s been over six months since Bridget came on board, so a major reshuffle in her leadership team seems inevitable at some point. I’m honestly surprised there haven’t been any changes yet. Who do you think is likely to raise or move on when it happens?


Who are all these people?

The whole problem with this company is the lack of visibility beyond line managers. I have no idea who my manager’s manager is, I’ve never met them, and I’ve never received a single message from them. Above that, there are another four layers of management who nobody ever hears from ever! And then we have the top brass who take all the profits and issue orders. No wonder the company is such a mess. By the time any direction filters down the message has changed completely, or just totally lost and forgotten.


Disconnect from the immediately!!

Sorry I didn't post this before more layoffs. While your manager is giving you the news, disconnect immediately from the internet. They can't scramble your laptop if they can't get to it. I was laid off on September 3rd. I've had access to my files all this time. I just got my box, so I'll go on the internet now and let them scramble it.


$246.5 million down the toilet

An all-cash deal to buy an OMS nobody’s even heard of. Most of their marquee clients have already walked. The president of LB was quietly shown the door, and there’s still no real leadership in place. How on earth did none of these red flags come up during what was supposed to be “extensive” due diligence before the acquisition? At what point do RR, SK, and FF get held accountable for these missteps? How is this not shaping up to be Cymba 2.0? And when does Sanoke finally break up the boy band and bring in leaders who actually know what they’re doing?


The Outsourced Villain

I didn’t get laid off. That’s my crime.

I’m still here in Bangalore — bleary-eyed at 2 a.m., staring into the blue glow of another Zoom call. The Americans on mute, the managers on script, the executives smiling from Spring, Texas, while delivering the latest sermon: “This is not a layoff. This is transformation.”

And I nod along. Because nodding is safer than questioning. Survival in this machine doesn’t mean performing well, or collaborating, or innovating. It means parroting the story exactly as it’s handed down. No edits. No hesitation. Clap when they clap. Smile when they smile. Pretend the slogans mean something when we all know they don’t.

On the anonymous forums, I read the curses: “Damn Indians.” “They took our jobs.” “Outsourcing ki-led us.”
And in that moment, I become the villain. Not an engineer, not a human, not a man with a family. Just a placeholder: cheap labor, offshore body, the thief in someone else’s story.

But here’s the punchline: I didn’t ki-l anyone’s job. Neither did the guy three floors above me or the coder across town pulling a night shift with chai and instant noodles. The true executioners sit higher up. Senior management writes the script. Middle management enforces it.

Middle managers — ah, the great priests of ExxonMobil. They don’t believe in the gospel, but they chant it anyway. They gather us in Zoom town halls and deliver the holy lines:
• “This is about efficiency.”
• “This is how we stay competitive.”
• “We must all align with leadership messaging.”

Then they turn off their cameras, go back to their spreadsheets, and quietly decide which “asset” is expendable.

And the rest of us clap. Because clapping is mandatory.

The truth is uglier than the curses: Americans blame Indians. Indians blame themselves. But the real game is higher. We are not colleagues anymore, just chess pieces moved to satisfy a curve, a cost target, a shareholder’s smile.

So yes, blame me if you must. Curse me for still having a job. But know this: tomorrow it might be some place else. Or an algorithm. The villain will always be whoever management points to, as long as the real architects stay untouched.

ExxonMobil says: Energy Lives Here.
But after this round of
sermons, we all know the translation:
Truth does not. Empathy does not. Only messaging does.


Dysfunction

Question for the folks that are in the factories. Are you guys leadership team dysfunctional or is it just ours. Seems the left hand don’t or won’t talk to the right hand. Nobody knows what’s going on. Always running out of things. Just curious if it’s isolated or wide spread.


Principal Engineer - doing managerial role - a total misuse of role

Why are Principal Engineers taking on reportees and performing managerial duties? Isn’t this a fundamental misuse of the role? A Principal Engineer is supposed to be a senior technical authority, driving architecture, innovation, and solving the most complex problems—not acting as a people manager. When they start collecting reportees, it raises a red flag: are they trying to shield themselves behind a team to inflate visibility and give the illusion of doing ‘more’ work than they actually are? This not only dilutes the technical bar but also creates confusion in accountability. Instead of leading by technical depth, they start operating as pseudo-managers, which neither serves engineering excellence nor respects the purpose of the role. In reality, it looks more like a strategy to hide from real technical challenges, while showcasing headcount as a false measure of impact.


Cut the bloat in upper SC instead of actual workers

There is no reason to have so many layers of management in the US for the supply chain group and I'm sure the same applies to other groups like polaris, gbs, emtec.
A prime example of bloat is the COE group in materials management full of people who aren't experts of anything but are the ones making over complex processes that fail and promoting made up savings figures to justify their jobs in houston. Why close our offices in sg and in canada when we have this bloat in likely every organization within XOM. Shame on SG and the VPs with their lies when EMSC was introduced.


Glad I left

I want to thank all the managers who made it so miserable that I found employment elsewhere. My group manager told me that I would eventually be laid off, said “if there is anything I can do for you, let me know.” I asked for a letter or recommendation, which he said he couldn’t because of company policy. Since I have left, not only have I been 10x happier with my new job, a majority of those managers who thought “I’m too important for them to let me go” were let go. I’m now full remote. There is hope outside the stagecoach.


RTO: 25% of bossess hint layoffs are the real purpose of RTO

New research suggests many companies have used return-to-office (RTO) mandates as a tool to reduce headcount. A BambooHR survey of over 1,500 U.S. managers found that one-quarter of C-suite executives admitted they hoped RTO policies would prompt voluntary resignations. One in five HR professionals acknowledged that their in-office requirements were specifically designed to make staff quit.

Nearly 40 percent of managers surveyed said their organizations eventually turned to layoffs because not enough workers left after RTO mandates were introduced. The report concludes that "RTO mandates are layoffs in disguise," echoing a sentiment long suspected by employees.

The backlash to rigid office policies has been well-documented. Amazon faced one of the largest employee protests, with about 30,000 workers signing a petition and more than 1,800 pledging to walk out in opposition to its RTO requirement. Many staffers described updating their résumés and job hunting immediately after the mandate.

Data shows that 99 percent of companies with RTO mandates have seen lower employee engagement, nearly half have experienced higher-than-expected attrition, and 29 percent are struggling to recruit. BambooHR’s research further found that about one-third of employees would consider quitting if forced back to the office, even if fewer ultimately follow through.

The findings highlight a growing divide between leadership strategies and employee expectations, raising questions about the long-term costs of rigid return-to-office enforcement.

https://fortune.com/2025/09/30/bosses-admit-return-to-office-mandates-meant-to-make-staff-quit/


Intel mgmt need to be humble

The intel middle mgmt needs to be humble n get off ur high horses

I was with a vendor company and came to the Hillsboro site for a technical review meeting , we were all properly dressed in smart business wear and hold n behold , the snr mgr who was hosting us appeared in his gym wear and slides … we were all applauded and talk among our selves at the airport commenting how unprofessionally that was.

I hope this gets to LipBu’s ears


New Managers

How many managers do they need? when there's an issue, 3 or 4 of them come to you and say the same thing, maybe they should just do it. We are busy with little staff. Maybe the managers should be evaluated by the assotiates like in the movie Office Space. To many cheifs not enough indians.


MST home dispatch tech use and abuse company assets

MST home dispatch tech use and abuse company assets. They drive 100K-200K bucket trucks to their home and back to their home garage everyday. Big V8 6.3 L engines use a lot of gas and insurance on top. Also, with MST high pay and only have .5 job per tech a day per tech how is that saving company money and liability.
There are rules to follow when joining home dispatch program. Following the rules helps save gas and time and wear and tear on a vehicle used to drive to work and to home. But MSTs abuse this program from driving to the garage every day and dispatching at the garage. Making a stop at the grocery store to grocery shop in the company vehicle before driving home. Not closing your last job at the job site and instead, drive home and being still dispatched on your work ticket and then closing the job when you arrive home. I follow the rules, and I do not want the home dispatch program to go away because of MSTs taking advantage of the abuse. Also, MST managers are favoring many MSTs and letting the home dispatch MSTs do what ever they want. STOP ABUSING THE HOME DISPATCH PROGRAM YOU MSTs. You know who you are...


IT&V

Has there ever been a bigger cr@pshow?

The systems, the process, and the endless disconnectedness. Non stop dysfunction. Will it ever stop?

What a huge mess. No one is ever accountable. We experience tons of effort to produce the most valueless work.

Get your 8 hours in, get your badge ins but please don’t add value. Anything but that.


Loosing good players

I found out many Cloud Engineering middle management people left OpenText because of uncertainty and mechanical behaviours of leadership. Out of curious, when i started talking to people over coffee , I learnt that IT under Chan*** have let go many long time, accomplished, hard working managers and that is making left out team quite delusional. I used to work for one the manager, who used to out 10 hrs a day even in weekends. This is ridiculous. No value for hard work n productive. Leadership is just a power mongers and replacing with their pets from other stores.


McChevron

Any news on when McKinsey will depart so we can all get back to work? It would sure be nice to focus on work instead of meeting with them daily simply so they can provide our leadership with a fictitious projection for savings. I no longer even try to provide them with accurate information since we all know they are serving as middle management in Chevron now. Of course, their very survival depends on drumming up more fictitious projects.


Poor leadership

At Dell Technologies, we lack good leadership. Instead of transparency, we see random layoffs, no coherent strategy, and no confidence instilled in employees or shareholders. Leadership is not about hiding behind tough decisions.. it’s about owning them, communicating them, and guiding people through them.

The difference between courage and cowardice is clarity.