#performance

Looking to hear data from actual employees about on-cycle and off-cycle raises? Meaning, has anyone ever negotiated a raise that didn’t coincide with the early December salary treatment supervisor discussion? I’m interested in hearing if you brought a competing offer to the table? What % raise did you ask for? Did you receive it? What time of year? Also interested to hear if anyone negotiated a higher raise % “on-cycle” meaning you did it at the early December salary treatment discussion. Any insights welcome.

Predict what’s about to occur now that a low price environment and halfhearted improvement initiatives are about to collide.
Will the market reward or punish current leadership?

Dell Federal was always the darling (along with Global). Federal had their own building annex next to building 3 when I was there (for -security- and their red outlined badges to easily identify them as part of the elite Fed team). They had the most lifers and boomers @ Dell. Many ex-military. Life couldn't get better at Dell if you were in Dell Federal Sales. Do they still reign supreme with their easy Government appropriations and special blanket purchase agreements worth billions of dollars... most of the mega easy commissions checks cut by Dell were for Federal AEs, ISRs, SEs and ISG/CSG TSRs. Hope they are still doing well and raking in the cash.

Apaches how’s the vibe now? You had 100 days to feel empowered and successful…now the man behind the curtain needs to drop trousers (oil price) so the midterms don’t destabilize the wizard of Oz.

What’s break even now? Can Apache continue nickel and dimming its vendors?

It's easy to focus on quarterly headlines. Harder to ignore a 46%+ loss in market value over 12 months. Don't forget the big picture.

I know there should be no surprise with the price of oil dropping, but Shell stock is tanking. I thought the company would have been doing better after all of the massive layoffs, divestments and stock buy backs. Have they gone too far?

Some people are getting axed based on profitability today- weren’t on plans, just based on years round performance out of the blue- always make sure that resume is updated- T is never a safe company to work at

Down another 50% in last year, now back to 2017 pricing. Tragicomic Q3 results puts this abject clownshow near 130 by EOD.

When your "operating model" is to find the most enthusiastically incompetent, dishonest, lazy "leaders" available and give them absolute control over sales, marketing, and service delivery...

Metric Value
Price on July 1, 2020 $23.40
Price on June 17, 2026 $22.54

Cumulative price return -3.7%
Holding period 5.96 years
Annualized price return -0.6%

MIP for PH was 70% which is crazy given the BU is a growth driver for Medtronic overall.

How you’ve found value by just restructuring the company is amazing. But how you will continue to post growth at this circling the drain is beyond even the most experienced insiders when we know this growth is financially engineered. This is a slow motion train wreck and if you don’t take the GE people out of this picture, you will also lose value. It takes consistent incompetence and grifting to destroy something with this much history and momentum and you guys have showed up late to the party.

Just heard that “Scribe Optimize” (a third party AI company) is going to be implemented across a few teams. Being sold as a way to optimize how long it takes to do tasks by tracking each employee on how long it takes them to do something and if they’re faster, then to teach others how they did it faster.

Soooo definitely just a new way to track employees and lay more folks off.

• 6%

First quarter bonus didn’t show up. Then they said they are working to resolve the issues. Is there a date by which this will be resolved?

At What age does your potential stop changing? For example, can potential still increase or decrease (based on performance) after you’re 40 or 50?

Who has the authority to change it? Your supervisor, manager or S&D?

Hope not, she has ruined FIG and it will be a drag to the financials for a long time because of her inability to lead

It’s evident that a seasoned professional knew he is unable to save this company and the company’s performance is damaging his professional reputation . Changing hands is just delaying the inevitable. The replacement was a necessity and nothing more. Good luck guys.

"I cannot promise you stable employment in top performing companies such as Cisco, but we want top performing employees who will stay and care about making an impact on the company" ???

The AMA was a giant gaslighting word salad

We're increasingly relying on very junior resources who often arrive with a great deal of confidence but very little context. Many are obsessed with visibility and impressing VPs and Directors, spending more energy crafting narratives and projecting competence than actually doing the work required to build it. Everyone seems eager to have an opinion on everything, despite being fresh out of school and lacking the historical context or operational understanding behind why certain decisions were made. Questioning assumptions is healthy; dismissing experience before understanding is not. Leadership often mistakes polished communication, executive presence, and confidence for capability. Those who manage perceptions rise quickly, while other carry the load. To make matters worse, some are very well connected, merit isn't always what drives opportunity. just look ate the recent hires.

Has anyone else dealt with environments where visibility is valued more than substance? Performance Vs perception he-l.

The company’s stock has been extremely volatile recently. Will the already low morale take an additional toll on the share price? Within my team, even with AI assistance, I haven’t seen more code being delivered. In fact, performance in terms of code output has unfortunately declined.

It really is amazing the lack of C Level /VP level of accountability over the years.

AOL, RedBox, bluejeans and now $47M FCC location privacy. For years employees drilled on CPNI.

Board d Member sats Hans needed to be fired immediately after 8 years of deckining stock price and net adds.

SCOTUS rules 8-1 and zero Vz accountability.

Yet if an ethical Vz sales person misses monthly targets.. 60 day PIP and fired.

There is zero hope under current Vz C Levels Verizon succeeds.

Next play is divest business units and watch C Levels all cash out $3M in stock options. Already happening.

Making your boss look good is a time-tested strategy for climbing the corporate ladder at all companies not just Verizon.

It doesn’t matter if they’re incompetent, or dishonest, or a je-k. Try to accomplish whatever goal they’re being graded on in a highly visible way. Don’t worry about the consequences of poorly thought out plans. That’s not your job. Pay lip service to whatever they’re paying lip service to.

This advice also applies to the Pulse survey. The correct answers are always everything is great.

I’m not being facetious. This is 100% real advice!

The experienced FA losses are really accelerating. Big promises that weren’t delivered by Penny and her ELT, unforced errors like ent reimagined and return to office impacting operations and aggressiveness of competitive recruiting are all contributing.

Only momentum helping EJ AUM right now is market exuberance…

https://www.fitchratings.com/entity/mutual-of-america-life-insurance-company-80091235

Rating Action Commentary

Fitch Revises Mutual of America's Outlook to Stable; Affirms IFS Rating at 'BBB+'
Fri 12 Jun, 2026 - 9:49 AM ET

Fitch Ratings - New York - 12 Jun 2026: Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Insurer Financial Strength (IFS) rating of Mutual of America Life Insurance Company (Mutual of America) at 'BBB+'. The Rating Outlook has been revised to Stable from Negative.

The revision of the Outlook reflects Mutual of America's continued balance sheet strength while executing on its strategic turnaround plan. The company produced a modest operating loss in 2025; however, core profitability improved yoy and Fitch views the plan as credible to further improve results through expense reductions and revenue expansion.

Mutual of America's rating is underpinned by its very strong capital position, demonstrated by its regulatory capital ratio, Prism capital model score and its lack of financial leverage. The rating is also highly influenced by the company's business profile, which reflects Mutual of America's position within the niche non-profit, small case retirement plan market and its differentiated approach to distribution, emphasizing underserved and underpenetrated portions of the market. The rating is currently constrained by Mutual of America's challenged profitability.

Key Rating Drivers
Pressured Profitability: Mutual of America's 'BBB+' IFS rating is one notch below the implied IFS rating of 'A-' due to its financial performance and earnings, which is the weakest link. The company reported net income of $2 million for 2025, compared with a net income of $53 million in 2024 and a net loss of $236 million in 2023. Positively, operating results improved yoy with a modest net loss of $15 million in 2025 compared with an operating loss of $155 million in the prior year, excluding the company's sale of the remaining stake in its home office building in New York City. In 1Q26, the company produced a net operating gain of $3 million. Fitch expects a slight loss for the full year 2026, followed by modest profitability in 2027. Profitability will be driven largely by continued reductions in expenses including vendor efficiency, contract rationalization, reduced real estate footprint and workforce optimization.

What a load of Rahul, no growth till 2029, that's a massive 12 years after the birth of DXC, and 6 years after Rahul took over, another 3 years away from now. Rahul thinks his swung another $80 million in pay but Wall Street is never going to buy it that far into the future. Watch the share price at $4.

So they laid off 150+ U.S. Associate Buyers last June but now have several positions posted on LinkedIn…. Is GenPact not working as well as they had hoped? Are they seeing their error in laying off based on tenure instead of performance? So many questions.

It used to be formal layoffs with packages were the only thing to worry about. Now they're moving toward firing people individually. I personally know three people let go for reasons that made no sense. One had fine reviews but was told their performance was poor. Really? I hope they talk to a lawyer.

M@rk, Kev, and Sean,

You can go to all the conferences and spin the story how you want, but it is not working. Results speak louder than spin. Investors are not buying it.

Must say...so many layoffs came and went....there are cosmetic layoff's in his empire but nothing significant. All his directs are still there. It can't be his or his directs' performance..none of them have any kind of pedigree in real data work. The whole thing is a house built on cards that will collapse when there is a proper regulatory exam under a proper administration.
Tim Ryan must be one helluva godfather

$38.57 and $82.74, these are critical factors in a stock's performance. It's one of the quickest and easiest ways to evaluate stock performance. Everyone gets this one. Evidently, the board does not. There is only person bearing the responsibility here.

Lee Raymond’s Famous Quotes on Employee Performance at ExxonMobil

Lee Raymond, CEO of ExxonMobil from 1999 to 2005, was known for his strong emphasis on merit-based systems, hard work, and the role of competition in driving performance. While he did not publish a single “employee performance” manifesto, several of his public statements reflect his philosophy on how people should be rewarded and motivated in business.

Key quotes related to performance and merit:

“The market system requires that people be committed and willing to work hard. Inherent with that is what I call a merit system, which I think gives people the greatest opportunity.”

This statement underscores his belief that performance should be tied to effort and results, with merit being the primary driver of advancement and rewards.

“The main professional responsibility of a person in business is business. He or she must be successful in economic terms, but always within an ethical framework.”

Raymond stressed that business success—measured by performance and profitability—is the core duty, with ethics as a guiding constraint weheartquotes.com.

“It is important to remember that all business has an impact on the lives of real people.”
This reflects his view that performance should be evaluated not just on numbers, but also on its tangible effects on people and communities weheartquotes.com.

“Ethical conduct is something that becomes inherent in an organization over a long period of time.”

While not directly about performance metrics, this implies that a culture of integrity supports sustainable, high-performing organizations weheartquotes.com.

Overall philosophy:

Raymond’s approach to employee performance was rooted in a meritocratic, results-oriented mindset. He believed that hard work, competition, and measurable success were the keys to both personal advancement and organizational success, while maintaining ethical standards as a foundation.

If you need a concise summary for a presentation or discussion, you could frame it as:

“At ExxonMobil, we reward those who are committed, willing to work hard, and deliver results—within an ethical framework. Merit, not favoritism, should be the standard for performance.”

And dfs employees are being thrown under the bus and calibrating to below strong.

This is to fill up the pip quota in order to save Cof employees.

Managers in dfs are new to this process so they can’t adequately defend their employees.

Anyone else having a different experience?

Why do industry observers and specifically BP staff automatically give high praise to Meg? Can one person from the outside manage to upright a failed strategy and a culture which abhors change?

How do managers sleep at night when they have to downgrade someone who clearly earned a better performance rating?

We are a meme stock

You can't slash decades of collective knowledge for a small budget win over and over again and then look confused when everything starts falling apart. That isn't bad luck, that is the direct result of your own choice.

Stink is a genius, RTO is working!!!

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang publicly praised Qualcomm’s mobile capabilities and humorously told investors to "buy their stock", Nvidia simultaneously announced the RTX Spark superchip to target the "Windows on Arm" PC market.