#culture

Posts mentioning hashtag #culture

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #culture.

Mention #culture in your post to continue the discussion!

Anthropic Claude Tag vs DXC Oasis and your near IT future (Clue: You don't have one)

For anyone who hasn't realised it yet, any external AI used by DXC e.g. Anthropic's Claude Tag, means that everything about DXC's thin layer of "value" will be consumed by the AI.
This quite an irony - The business of DXC taking over IT departments and "leveraging" employees (i.e. shedding) is now being replicated to DXC i.e. DXC's existance is being "leveraged" by Anthropic (as well as all the other SI companies).

When you think about it, whilst this is a disaster for young DXC employees, its a great opportunity for those near retirement. Its no longer about someone leaving DXC for another SI, its about either leaving to work for an end customer or leaving the IT industry all together.


This company has truly changed.

It used to be a place that valued intelligence and creative thinking—a place that took the time to nurture those ideas and bring them to life. Bottom-up really worked here, once.
And now? Collaboration in name only.

It’s full of political operators who shamelessly claim their subordinates’ achievements as their own, and mere clowns who latch onto those operators like remoras clinging to a shark. It’s a culture that swats down bold, unconventional ideas with the brute force of majority rule.

Talk of short-term results and targets has become deafening. There’s no respect left for building a real argument, no respect for intelligence. The only thing that thrives here is harassment carefully calibrated to stop just short of being called harassment.

I’ve concluded that this company has rotted from its people outward.

Goodbye.

I HAD TO REPOST, NOT MY POST:
6 days ago by Anonymous | 10 reactions (+10/-0) | Reply
Post ID: @pj+1kva8jdvr


AI has ki-led my passion for being a software engineer.

I joined this industry a decade ago bright-eyed and excited to write code and implement solutions. Now everything is just AI. AI this, AI that. It's utterly soulless. I'm seriously considering going back to college and switching to a different field or something.


ACTION REQUIRED: MANDATORY SURVEY

This is optional. But it's optional.

It's anonymous. Almost.

Published by: BofA Executive Director of Sarcasm and Irony

(1) On a scale of 1 to 5, how excited are you to provide feedback that will be carefully reviewed, summarized, ignored, and filed away forever?

(2) How confident are you that leadership already knows the survey results before you submit them?

(3) Which follow-up action do you expect after this survey?
A. A thoughtful action plan
B. A vague email about “listening”
C. A slide deck proving engagement is up
D. Another survey asking why survey participation is down

(4) How valued do you feel when management asks for honest feedback and then explains why your feedback is wrong?

(5) What is the main purpose of this survey?
A. Improving the workplace
B. Measuring employee sentiment
C. Creating the appearance of concern
D. Supporting someone’s promotion packet

(6) How much do you agree with this statement: “My feedback directly contributes to leadership bonuses, even if it contributes to nothing else.”

(7) If this survey leads to action, which action is most likely?
A. More meetings
B. More dashboards
C. More corporate language
D. More reminders to complete the next survey

(8) How safe do you feel being completely honest in an anonymous survey that somehow still knows your department, level, manager, location, and employee group?

(9) Which phrase would you most like to see retired from the survey results email?
A. “We hear you”
B. “Actionable insights”
C. “You spoke, we listened”
D. “We are committed to transparency”

(10) Would you recommend this survey to a coworker?
A. Yes, if they enjoy performance art
B. Yes, if they need a break from real work
C. No, but I’ll forward the reminder anyway
D. Only if leadership completes one too


Micromanagement

I’ve been in the workforce over 30 years ( including 16 of them at US Bank) and I’ve never encountered this level of micromanagement where salaried professionals are treated like they’re hourly employees. This is not meant to disparage anyone hourly at all but being on salary has typically meant you aren’t tracked on an hourly basis. You are trusted to be mature and professional enough to manage your time and perform your job and if you aren’t getting your job done, you get fired. You are evaluated based on your overall performance not based on where you’re sitting and for how long. Simple.

This just boggles my mind because it’s so draconian.

Bumping from @aq+1kt7a1e2m.


Protect yourself

I've learned that when you go above and beyond for a company that sees you as a number, you're only hurting yourself. They won't reward you or remember the extra hours, the extra effort, and the extra stress you put yourself through. None of it changes anything. So stop doing it. Do what you're paid for. Nothing more, nothing less.


The best people aren't complaining, they're leaving

Nobody's hearing the top performers gripe about how bad things are, and that's not because they're fine with it. They're just quietly working their networks, sending out applications, and planning their escape without making a scene. By the time leadership realizes they're gone, it'll be too late because all the people who actually carried the weight will have already found their way out.


Complete disconnect

It's wild how disconnected senior leadership is from the actual day to day. They sit in their meetings looking at spreadsheets and making decisions that have nothing to do with how things operate on the floor. Meanwhile, the people who actually know what's going on are put on ignore, and then they wonder why their grand plans never work out.


SURVEY: Do this...

Let's do it, you've got to do it. but it's optional. It's anonymous, I promise, for real.

Exxon Quarterly Employee Survey by VP of Sarcasm and Irony

  1. On a scale of 1 to 5, how excited are you to provide feedback that will be carefully reviewed, summarized, ignored, and filed away forever?

  1. How confident are you that leadership already knows the survey results before you submit them?

  1. Which follow-up action do you expect after this survey?
  • A. A thoughtful action plan
  • B. A vague email about “listening”
  • C. A slide deck proving engagement is up
  • D. Another survey asking why survey participation is down

  1. How valued do you feel when management asks for honest feedback and then explains why your feedback is wrong?

  1. What is the main purpose of this survey?
  • A. Improving the workplace
  • B. Measuring employee sentiment
  • C. Creating the appearance of concern
  • D. Supporting someone’s promotion packet

  1. How much do you agree with this statement: “My feedback directly contributes to leadership bonuses, even if it contributes to nothing else.”

  1. If this survey leads to action, which action is most likely?
  • A. More meetings
  • B. More dashboards
  • C. More corporate language
  • D. More reminders to complete the next survey

  1. How safe do you feel being completely honest in an anonymous survey that somehow still knows your department, level, manager, location, and employee group?

  1. Which phrase would you most like to see retired from the survey results email?
  • A. “We hear you”
  • B. “Actionable insights”
  • C. “You spoke, we listened”
  • D. “We are committed to transparency”

  1. Would you recommend this survey to a coworker?
  • A. Yes, if they enjoy performance art
  • B. Yes, if they need a break from real work
  • C. No, but I’ll forward the reminder anyway
  • D. Only if leadership completes one too

Can we fix the issues that cause the majority of problems? Please?

We're constantly running around putting out fires that'd stop happening if someone just fixed the source. But nobody wants to invest the time, because...I can't even figure out why. It'd make everybody look good if it was done. What am I missing here, people???


Who is in charge of the company

I cannot believe the direction our company has been going in. It is like the people in charge have lost their minds ! First the horrible change with our forklifts.. now we had to take all of our back end caps down . All this wasted space .. where do they think all the extra stuff they buy is going to go.. especially with the holidays coming soon. They over buy clothing … ugly clothing .. then we have to give it all away to a liquidator.. we have special events with mattresses .. which they over buy and we had to pull those to give to the backroom for the liquidator .. seems like we are in business to make them money instead of us


Wells Fargo is approaching breaking the record

...for longest period of time that a public company has posted consistent YOY headcount declines.

I got curious this morning about just how unusual the situation at Wells is, and decided to do some digging. Based on the information I can find, here's some of the existing records for longest consecutive streaks of corporate downsizing:

IBM went through 8 years of downsizing from 1985 to 1993 as the tech market moved from mainframes to personal computers, shrinking from a high of 405k employees to 219k by 1993.

General Motors went through 7 years of YOY headcount reductions from 2002 to 2009 as a result of foreign competition and shrinking market share, up until their bankruptcy in the wake of the global financial crisis and bailout by the US government.

Blackberry/RIM posted 5 straight years of headcount cuts from 2011 to 2016 as a result of competition from iPhone and Android, finishing in 2016 with 25% of the employees they started with.

Wells is currently running a streak from 2019 to today, blowing past Blackberries record and in line with GM. Given the CEO's public statements, we're also on track to beat IBM as well. Don't you feel proud to work here?

(My point was this post was just to let folks know, if this feels like an overwhelmingly toxic place to work, you are not alone. The situation at Wells is extraordinarily, historically bad. This is not normal)


Teams Channels

I am so beyond fed up with all the pins and different threads or channels whatever they’re called on teams. We have a chat for a weekly call but now we have to use a completely different thread to put everything so now we have two probably even three different threads with basically the same group on the same topic.. they’re telling us you can use the chat during the call but use the channel for everything else so all our details are consolidated in one place… how does this make sense?!? I’m so tired of having 50 different places to look for what I need and having my pin go off every 15 seconds throughout the day.. it’s beyond distracting and unproductive at this point.

And I don’t even see the notifications, despite the fact that I followed all the instructions to request that I’m notified about these channels. SO FED UP WITH THIS STUPIDITY. Obnoxious!


Why do “leadership” hate the employees?

We’re all adults here with careers, families, mortgages, and kids.

Yet we’re being treated like toddlers who need constant supervision, or maybe Stink just thinks we’re his prisoners.

Presence reports. Badge tracking. Attendance monitoring. Endless RTO enforcement. Isn’t it a bit much?.. All of it sends the same message, leadership doesn’t trust its employees, and once trust is gone, disengagement follows.

Seriously, why would anyone want to work in an environment like this?

The company talks endlessly about “culture” while implementing policies that actively destroy it.

The result is exactly what you’d expect, lower morale, higher turnover, and employees spending more time worrying about presence reports, FTW letters, and layoffs than innovation or growth.

When professionals are treated like they’re one badge swipe away from detention, it’s hard to feel respected or motivated. Especially when they’re blaming the masses for the faults of 1% who are no longer here.

You can mandate attendance, but you can’t mandate trust, engagement, or hard work & dedication. Loyalty and trust go hand in hand, and this CEO said “loyalty is dead”.


Advice to Management:

Although I’m no longer with Centene, I still care deeply about its mission and the people working to achieve it. That’s why I’m taking the time to write this.

One pattern I’ve seen across large organizations is the belief that the next framework, consulting engagement, or AI initiative will unlock better execution. Those things all have value. They bring fresh ideas, experience, and structure. But none of them can replace organizational clarity.

When priorities change faster than results can be measured, it becomes difficult to know what actually worked. Strategies get replaced before they can be fairly evaluated, and organizations end up changing multiple variables at the same time. At that point, you’re no longer learning from the strategy. You’re learning from the interruption.

From the individual contributor’s perspective, people stop asking, “Is this the right direction?” and start asking, ”How long until this changes again?” Eventually they stop optimizing for outcomes and start optimizing for adaptability. That’s not resistance to change. It’s a rational response to uncertainty.

The same challenge applies to outside consultants. They can bring experience, structure, and proven approaches, but they can’t create clarity where it doesn’t already exist. If priorities, success measures, and strategic direction continue to shift, even great recommendations struggle because the organization is still redefining the problem they were brought in to solve.

Landing the plane…

If I could offer one piece of advice, it would be this.

Create the conditions for success before looking for the next solution.

Define what success looks like.

Decide how you’ll measure it.

Give your managers and teams enough stability to execute.

Give the strategy enough time to produce meaningful results.

Then let the data, not the calendar, tell you what needs to change next.

Frameworks matter.

Technology matters.

Consultants matter.

  • Employees matter most.*

Every reorganization, every strategy shift, and every new operating model is experienced by people who care deeply about the mission and genuinely want to do great work. When people lose confidence that today’s priority will still matter tomorrow, the organization loses something much harder to rebuild than a process. It loses trust.

To everyone still there, don’t lose sight of why you chose this work in the first place. Your knowledge, your compassion, and your commitment to members still matter. Those things don’t disappear because the organization is going through change.

I sincerely hope Centene succeeds. The mission is too important, and there are too many good people working every day to make a difference. My hope for leadership is simple: create the clarity, stability, and trust that allows those people to do what they’ve always wanted to do…serve members, support one another, and do their best work.

✌️

  • AI helped me tighten the writing. The observations, opinions, and experiences are my own.*

Who's left that's considered a leader?

Being with Canon for so many years, I believe and feel we still have some inspiring leaders, maybe not enough of them, but we have hope with the ones that still hopefully remain in place. I know the site is filled with negativity right now, and I understand, but maybe one post that offers some positive light at the end of the tunnel will help? Who's your favorite leader by initial only and group?


AITECH & AIBIZ: Devaluing Engineers

Cisco AITECH offers a free, 15-hour crash course and AIBIZ providing only high-level business concepts without a formal exam!

Translation: loss of company $$$ + a way to bypass hiring qualified engineers, allowing non-technical managers to fake technical expertise and undermine the value of a rigorous engineering degree.

ONLY Cisco did this. Top companies knew better.

  • 95% of AI pilots fail to deliver measurable profit-and-loss impact is accurate, sourced from the MIT NANDA report.

  • Despite $30–40 billion in enterprise investment, only 5% of integrated AI pilots extract measurable value.

  • Harvard Business Review says AI is flooding workflows with low-quality output that requires more human intervention to validate, creating a net loss in productivity.

Bottom Line - products, sales fail because they treat AI as a plug-in tool.


Are people avoiding Oracle these days?

We've been trying to fill a role for months, and we've gotten almost no qualified applicants. It almost feels like qualified people have heard the stories, know what it's like here, and are staying away as a result. We desperately need help, but I don't think we'll get it anytime soon.


Things are getting out of control

I'm so tired of being punished every time I take a little extra time to help a customer. We're not working in a manufacturing factory. We're not working on a conveyor belt. I need to be able to interact with people without worrying that it's going to cause problems with my manager.


UKI Leadership Call, did you attend? Vote up for yes or down for no.

Don’t normally attend these monthly calls but decided to tune in today. Well that was an hour wasted. Mainly insufferable people droning on in corporate speak about absolute BS. Main takeaway was hearing that 400 UK staff are on a PIP? Is this bell curve requirements, something for middle managers to do, a tick box exercise or all 3? Oh and not a word about pay review.


Londonderry - Avoid like the plague

Since my last post got deleted, I won't go into specifics but the Londonderry office is a disaster. Lots of managers and senior people leaving. Morale extremely low.

I have worked at 4 other places in my career and the negativity flowing through this one is the worst. Please avoid IVS.


A SITH SHOW AT META

  1. Meta's CTO, Andrew Bosworth, admitted the company's AI reorganization was poorly communicated and that leadership did "an atrocious job explaining the vision."

https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/the-worst-its-ever-been-why-metas-massive-ai-reorg-backfired-spectacularly/91363370

  1. Bosworth acknowledged employee morale has likely reached "the worst it's ever been."

  2. The new Applied AI division left many engineers feeling directionless, unsupported, and disconnected from leadership.

  3. One major problem was excessively large management spans, with some managers overseeing well over 20 direct reports.

  4. Employees reported feeling like anonymous members of oversized, hastily assembled teams rather than valued contributors.

  5. Meta now plans to cap managers at roughly 20 direct reports, reduce unnecessary manager changes during reorganizations, and introduce AI coaching tools.

  6. Organizational psychologist Bob Sutton noted that research has long shown large teams suffer from coordination, collaboration, and communication problems.

  7. Studies indicate that smaller teams are particularly important for creative, innovative, and highly interdependent work like AI development.

  8. Research covering more than 50 million papers, patents, and software projects found teams with fewer than five members were most likely to produce disruptive innovations.

  9. The article compares Meta's situation to Jeff Bezos' "Two Pizza Rule," which advocates keeping teams small enough to be fed with two pizzas.

  10. As Amazon evolved, it shifted toward assigning a single accountable leader to large initiatives while preserving clear ownership and coordination.

  11. Meta's reorganization appears to have done neither: teams remained very large without strong centralized ownership, contributing to confusion and declining morale.

  12. The article warns that current trends toward eliminating middle management can backfire, particularly in knowledge work requiring creativity and close collaboration.

  13. Leadership coach Beth Steinberg argues that managers with too many reports cannot effectively coach, develop, or support employees, leaving them only able to push work forward.

  14. The overall lesson is that organizations seeking flatter structures should carefully balance efficiency with effective management, communication, and team size, especially in innovation-driven environments like AI.


SpaceX-Leadership and culture

From another post-Gotta love Elon

Is Elon Musk laying off employees?
AI Overview

3
Yes, Elon Musk has fired a significant number of employees across his companies over the years. His major workforce reductions include:
X (formerly Twitter): Following his acquisition of the company, Musk eliminated roughly 80% of the platform's workforce through a combination of abrupt firings, mass layoffs, and stringent ultimatums (e.g., demanding employees commit to an "extremely hardcore" work environment or resign).
Aura Intelligence

  • 1
    Tesla: The company laid off over 10% of its global workforce amid a restructuring phase.

YouTube
SpaceX: Musk has fired employees at his aerospace company, which has also drawn legal complaints from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regarding the alleged unlawful termination of staff who were critical of his behavior.

YouTube
·CBC News
Federal Government: Musk heavily participated in federal workforce reduction efforts, including the controversial dismissal of thousands of federal agency personnel and administrative worakers