#team

Posts mentioning hashtag #team

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #team.

Mention #team in your post to continue the discussion!

Security Incidents Increase and Security Team Reduction over 2 Years -

With Brad Arkin at the helm, Salesforce's security team reportedly shrank from ~300+ to 188 engineers over two years, aligning with company-wide restructurings amid AI adoption and efficiency drives. No public data specifically attributes incident spikes to these cuts, but one has to ask. The volume of breaches has fueled speculation about under-resourcing in security.

Do they regret the security headcount drop? No explicit statements, but the incident surge (from sporadic in 2024 to widespread in 2025) and AI backpedaling suggest possible hindsight regrets and prioritizing efficiency over robust defense in a high-threat landscape like Salesforce.

Major Incidents-
Late 2024 – Early 2025 Vishing Wave (UNC6040)
June–July 2025 Major Vishing Campaign (UNC6040)
August 2025 Salesloft Drift OAuth Breach (UNC6395)
September–October 2025 Extortion & Leak Escalation (Scattered LAPSUS$ Hunters)
Late 2025 – Early 2026 Follow-On Incidents


Bloated org chart - what gives?

I’m looking at all the people between me and MW on the upstream ladder… 9 layers total. Looking closer, I truly don’t understand how this org chart got approved. MW has (arguably) at least 3 layers of unnecessary management between him and the front lines. Take MN for example - he only has 3 (and that is being generous) real employees reporting to him. Within those three, CN seems to be running 70% of the company.

Even MW’s team is pretty small if we look at the very top. Arguably the only people of consequence that report directly to him are RB, EB, FM, and MN. That’s it? What gives?

I know at least a few low-level senior execs read this forum. How about we send MN & BN into retirement with a nice package, give BN’s job to CN; and have Shale & Tight, Exploration, Offshore, and International/miscellaneous all report directly to MW along with a midstream person & the various corporate support leaders. Dump everything else in operations underneath those people in one, big, beautiful org chart.

Is the idea that MW isn’t involved in operations in the slightest, and MN/CN are expected to handle everything? I’m not a McKinsey management expert, but generally it seems like the more you understand what your company actually does on a day-to-day basis, the higher quality your decisions. I find it hard to believe that the current structure facilitates this kind of transparency for MW.

Didn’t MW explicitly call out this problem in SETH ‘24 when he blamed middle-management filtering for clouding the disaster that was FGP? So why did we go and keep the same number of people between MW and the front lines?

In 2030, maybe we should try flattening the pyramid instead of narrowing it. Food for thought!

Happy WFH Monday everyone.


POD 3.0

So, received announcement for POD 3.0. It seems to be a “every account for itself” model and creating technology silos. If a POD needs XYZ skills; the POD is supposed to build that skill, even though it may be existing somewhere within Kyndryl. Current practices that support multiple industries being broken down to fit this POD model.


1/23 Layoffs Thread

If you are impacted by today’s layoff please post here to help consolidate information. Please post your division (Optum Tech, Optum Insight, OptumRX, etc) if you feel comfortable, how many people in your team. If you want to go deeper like M&R, E&I, etc that helps.

Don’t forget, you will get through this, you will bounce back. This place is toxic and I hope we all can find some peace.


My team is barely functioning

If we get more cuts, everything will break down. I'm refusing to pick up the work from people who were let go. If one person needs to do the work of three, then those other two shouldn't have been laid off in the first place. I'm not going to work my a-s off just to be laid off at the next opportunity.


They didn't have a choice

Look, micro moving to consumer put a majority of the revenue in a place that was and is to be driven through automation.

TMUS Global Services will then drive costs of operations and IT to 50% of its current cost structure (see MTUS India Jobs).

What was left was a COGS / SGaA supporting business/government that was unsustainable for a company who only sells 4 SKUS (Voice, nonVoice, IoT, HSI) and all other products were both unprofitable and not aligned to core pull-through.

And lastly, the business' ability to manage and account for both talent and performance put the business in a bind. Remove titles, cut teams, throw the grenade...and hire back after the dust settles.

Stock needs to have the support to get back to 225+ and it wasn't in the current playbook or operations.

I lost my entire team, many were uber talented and new and contributing. But nobody in the business was able to account for the talent. Its odd that talent management is no longer an asset.


What could timelines look like?

We all know that the timeline to make a room OPO employees at Deerfield. Based on that what could possible time line look like for re-org and may be layoffs.

Here is what I think it may look like:

Identify who they will still stay with the company by the end of this week.

Identify which teams they will belong to by end of next week.

Identify where the teams will sit and communicate with affected employees by the end of the month.

Here is what the structure could look like:

C-Level (CEO, CFO, COO, CIO etc)

  • Eight Directors reporting to each
    • Eight Managers
      • Eight Team members ( Leads if managing large offshore team)
        • Eight Off Shore Resources

All would be aligned to achieve same goals every 15 days to a month.

There might be product management team who will continuously be managing prioritized backlog. Their whole deliverable every two weeks is to add new approved items to the backlog.


Team Washington?

With all the layoffs happening, do we still have an ED and his team working on 5G out in Redmond, Washington. I think they had 3 employees and 4 contractors. They had to travel to Philly regularly to stay under the radar, but I haven’t heard much from them lately.


Thoughts on a "one book office."

With the push for FAs to share office space, there are FA teams merging to combine AUM into one-book partnerships. All of the "book" will be evenly divided among each FA.

What will the success rate be of these partnerships?

Does EJ have all of the partnership arrangements worked out (legalities) or have these situations been patched together (which is a possibility because management is discombobulated, to say the least)?

I've heard of one branch that has 4 "partners."
2 veteran FAs, an AFA and a brand new college graduate that hasn't passed testing yet (already considered a partner and included in talks).

Curious what the success rate of a set up like this might be? Family members sharing a book sounds like it could be successful, but with 4 distinct unrelated individuals (friends) sharing a book......I am skeptical on the success rate.

Curious what your opinions are on this new EJ drive to "share one book" equally among FAs."

Would enjoy hearing your thoughts on this matter.


Support team realignment 2026 working hours

Supposedly Belk corporate is considering a support team re-alignment. There have been numerous complaints through the company about support associates working extremely early shifts when they are needed at all times during store hours. One store employee claimed that Human Resources was never in the building when the bulk of associates were working because they always left by 2 or 3pm, and therefore associates were left without Human Resource assistance if needed. Instead of these early morning (6-2,7-4,7-3) shifts support associates will work a mix of mornings, nights, weekends, mid shifts, similar to sales team managers, and regular associates. This includes Human Resources, fulfillment, cash office, dock/truck, merchandising, and housekeeping. You heard it here first, more to come in the new year.


promotion vs exceeds vs meets

all the thank you notes from the top of the company. but vps and under are still always in a 24 x7 panic, blame game mode. in the team, how much if they up the grade vs exceeds meets , ive been here 3 years..last year when the company was doing well. they gave me peanuts, this time how much can i expect? meets - 3k , exceeds 7k?


This year was exceptionally depressing

I was among the lucky few who actually had a great team. A few a--holes here and there, but otherwise solid, reliable colleagues. Somehow, we managed to overcome management’s shortcomings, make our tasks easier, and even have fun, or at least feel a sense of accomplishment. Yes, it was a cosmic accident, but it happened. I actually liked my work because of it.

Then the reorg came and destroyed the team. A few exceptionally competent and experienced teammates were let go, some were reassigned, and now my team is hollow and definitely less efficient and productive. The inability to recognize an excellent team says everything you need to know about leadership and management. I can only imagine the end result of reorg.